Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 49% Yacht	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	0.54% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	47.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 16GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

8 years ago, 8 years ago.

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5504 489 User benchmarks, average bench 52% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2 GHz Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	56% Above average	Memory 77.9 1-Core 50.8 2-Core 98.7 49% 75.8 Pts	4-Core 199 8-Core 202 27% 200 Pts	64-Core 202 12% 202 Pts
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 56% Great: 58%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro NVS 295 975 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Nvidia(10DE 062F) 256MB Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 9.18.13.1135 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	0.54% Terrible	Lighting 0.6 Reflection 1.31 Parallax 0.28 0% 0.73 fps	MRender 0.9 Gravity 0.43 Splatting 0.96 1% 0.76 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.54% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
LSI MegaSR 127GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 76GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.0 Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	47.3% Average	Read 522 Write 181 Mixed 270 71% 324 MB/s	4K Read 10.4 4K Write 11.8 4K Mixed 4.94 28% 9.07 MB/s	DQ Read 221 DQ Write 98.3 DQ Mixed 11.7 48% 110 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 47.3% Great: 60%
PNY USB 2.0 FD 16GB 181 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 15GB free, PID fa05 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	4.22% Terrible	Read 16.5 Write 4.73 Mixed 7.09 10% 9.44 MB/s	4K Read 3.28 4K Write 0.006 4K Mixed 0.007 13% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 4.22% Great: 10%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9965525-026.A00LF 9965525-026.A00LF ATMEL 26DF321 52GB 800, 800, 33 MHz 8192, 8192, 36864 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	29.2% Poor	MC Read 10.7 MC Write 9 MC Mixed 9.5 28% 9.73 GB/s	SC Read 7.6 SC Write 8.1 SC Mixed 7.9 22% 7.87 GB/s	Latency 84.5 47% 84.5 ns

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16