TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asrock QC-B365-TDIMM

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics26.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive284% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsrock QC-B365-TDIMM  (all builds)
Memory27.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190927
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 17 '23 at 19:09
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700K-$264
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
94.3% Outstanding
Memory 84.2
1-Core 128
2-Core 268
88% 160 Pts
4-Core 560
8-Core 928
91% 744 Pts
64-Core 973
60% 973 Pts
Poor: 82% ↑
This bench: 94.3%
 Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-Ti-$362
Asus(1043 841F) 2GB
CLim: 1254 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
26.6% Poor
Lighting 31.2
Reflection 29
Parallax 41.3
25% 33.8 fps
MRender 37
Gravity 40.2
Splatting 30.7
29% 36 fps
Poor: 23% ↑
This bench: 26.6%
 Great: 29%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 PRO with Heatsink 1TB
699GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1150 1538 1463 1663 1577 1618 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
284% Outstanding
Read 1,989
Write 1,866
Mixed 1,728
SusWrite 1,502
398% 1,771 MB/s
4K Read 42.6
4K Write 97.7
4K Mixed 62
196% 67.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,252
DQ Write 1,064
DQ Mixed 1,171
874% 1,162 MB/s
Poor: 236% ↑
This bench: 284%
 Great: 477%
Samsung 860 Evo 2TB-$235
547GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 324 404 412 414 402 401 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 487
Write 460
Mixed 441
SusWrite 393
100% 445 MB/s
4K Read 31.4
4K Write 86.9
4K Mixed 39.4
144% 52.6 MB/s
DQ Read 369
DQ Write 310
DQ Mixed 339
254% 339 MB/s
Poor: 89% ↑
This bench: 103%
 Great: 133%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB-$68
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
82.5% Excellent
MC Read 31.9
MC Write 33.5
MC Mixed 23.7
85% 29.7 GB/s
SC Read 15.8
SC Write 32.9
SC Mixed 23.9
69% 24.2 GB/s
Latency 73.1
55% 73.1 ns
Poor: 59% ↑
This bench: 82.5%
 Great: 111%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical QC-B365-TDIMM Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock QC-B365-TDIMM

CPU
Core i7-9700KIntel  $264Bench 97%, 550,833 samples2x
Core i3-9100Intel  $122Bench 80%, 7,621 samples2x
Core i7-8700Intel  $186Bench 87%, 349,567 samples1x
GPU
GTX 660-TiNvidia  $362Bench 26%, 42,960 samples2x
HD 5870AMDBench 19%, 10,176 samples1x
UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i3)IntelBench 5%, 32,403 samples1x
SSD
MZ7TE256HMHP-000L7 256GBSamsungBench 70%, 4,594 samples2x
860 Evo 2TBSamsung  $235Bench 113%, 44,466 samples1x
PLUS 480GBSandiskBench 48%, 58,990 samples1x
RAM
CL16-16-16 D4-2133 1x8GBSamsungBench 39%, 18 samples2x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair  $68Bench 85%, 86,372 samples2x
Ripjaws V DDR4 2666 C15 2x8GBG.SKILLBench 77%, 2,402 samples1x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 51% - Above average Total price: $626
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback