Alienware 15 R3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 77%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 63%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics114% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAlienware 15 R3  (all builds)
MotherboardAlienware Alienware 15 R3
Memory25.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211209
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 17 '23 at 18:54
Run Duration220 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
67.8% Good
Memory 83.3
1-Core 84.1
2-Core 164
65% 110 Pts
4-Core 283
8-Core 447
45% 365 Pts
64-Core 456
28% 456 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 67.8%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 531.18
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
114% Outstanding
Lighting 154
Reflection 169
Parallax 174
125% 166 fps
MRender 118
Gravity 145
Splatting 113
102% 125 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 114%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba XG5 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$33
186GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AADA4106 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,331
Write 176
Mixed 248
125% 585 MB/s
4K Read 19
4K Write 72.4
4K Mixed 35.7
113% 42.4 MB/s
DQ Read 457
DQ Write 184
DQ Mixed 340
246% 327 MB/s
Poor: 78% Great: 216%
WD Blue 3D SATA M.2 1TB-$104
274GB free
Firmware: X61190WD
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 283
Write 288
Mixed 215
58% 262 MB/s
4K Read 9.7
4K Write 50.3
4K Mixed 30.9
81% 30.3 MB/s
DQ Read 367
DQ Write 311
DQ Mixed 252
212% 310 MB/s
Poor: 69% Great: 120%
NT-512 512GB
375GB free
Firmware: H180516
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 322
Write 284
Mixed 380
74% 329 MB/s
4K Read 26.1
4K Write 49.2
4K Mixed 29.9
104% 35.1 MB/s
DQ Read 235
DQ Write 291
DQ Mixed 282
207% 269 MB/s
Poor: 45% Great: 110%
Seagate ST5000LM000-2AN170 5TB
1TB free
Firmware: 0001
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 48.7
Write 85.7
Mixed 53.2
47% 62.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 3.8
4K Mixed 0.5
143% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 31% Great: 64%
Seagate Expansion HDD 8TB
4.5TB free
Firmware: 1801
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 140
Write 168
Mixed 114
105% 141 MB/s
4K Read 4.9
4K Write 3.7
4K Mixed 0.8
362% 3.13 MB/s
Poor: 18% Great: 94%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 4TB
1TB free
Firmware: D781
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 66.4
Write 101
Mixed 69.3
59% 79 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
151% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 15% Great: 98%
Seagate One Touch Hub 8TB
5TB free
Firmware: 0064
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 131 134 106 130 133 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
65.4% Good
Read 99.5
Write 113
Mixed 32.2
SusWrite 127
67% 92.9 MB/s
4K Read 2.4
4K Write 5.8
4K Mixed 0.4
252% 2.87 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 65.4%
Great: 91%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
ED9D3616 BLS16G4S26BFSD.16FBD 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
76.7% Very good
MC Read 26.8
MC Write 31.1
MC Mixed 25.9
80% 27.9 GB/s
SC Read 12.6
SC Write 27.2
SC Mixed 21.6
58% 20.5 GB/s
Latency 74.7
54% 74.7 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 76.7%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 15 R3 Builds (Compare 2,007 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

System: Alienware 15 R3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback