Asus TUF Gaming FX505GD_PX505GD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics5.82% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive125% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus TUF Gaming FX505GD_PX505GD  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX505GD
Memory8.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200525
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 17 '23 at 18:12
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
74.9% Very good
Memory 83.8
1-Core 116
2-Core 232
81% 144 Pts
4-Core 368
8-Core 456
53% 412 Pts
64-Core 584
36% 584 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 74.9%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Asus(1043 13B1) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6577
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
5.82% Terrible
Lighting 6.6
Reflection 29.3
Parallax 6.9
5% 14.3 fps
MRender 7.3
Gravity 6.4
Splatting 10
7% 7.9 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.82%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G-1002 256GB
178GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 20110000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 416 421 350 337 330 336 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
125% Outstanding
Read 786
Write 692
Mixed 568
SusWrite 365
135% 603 MB/s
4K Read 34
4K Write 77.9
4K Mixed 46.5
152% 52.8 MB/s
DQ Read 618
DQ Write 444
DQ Mixed 483
374% 515 MB/s
Poor: 86%
This bench: 125%
Great: 187%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
660GB free
Firmware: SDM4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 106 105 106 106 104 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
51.5% Above average
Read 72.9
Write 117
Mixed 55
SusWrite 105
64% 87.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 0.6
196% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 51.5%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2K43CB1-CTD 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
41.9% Average
MC Read 15
MC Write 14.9
MC Mixed 12.1
40% 14 GB/s
SC Read 12.4
SC Write 13.2
SC Mixed 13.9
38% 13.2 GB/s
Latency 73.8
54% 73.8 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 41.9%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Gaming FX505GD_PX505GD Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Asus TUF Gaming FX505GD_PX505GD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback