Colorful X15 AT 23

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 159%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 115%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 193%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 112%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics141% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive265% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemColorful X15 AT 23  (all builds)
MotherboardCOLORFUL X15 AT 23
Memory22.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit 种颜色
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230105
Uptime5.3 Days
Run DateApr 17 '23 at 15:21
Run Duration202 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-13900HX
U29, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
112% Outstanding
Memory 76.9
1-Core 216
2-Core 416
122% 236 Pts
4-Core 788
8-Core 1376
131% 1,082 Pts
64-Core 3,132
194% 3,132 Pts
Poor: 108%
This bench: 112%
Great: 120%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4070 (Laptop)
Clevo(1558 A650) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 4000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 531.61
Performing below potential (69th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
141% Outstanding
Lighting 192
Reflection 160
Parallax 192
157% 181 fps
MRender 268
Gravity 162
Splatting 117
142% 182 fps
Poor: 94%
This bench: 141%
Great: 152%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSDPEKNU512GZ 512GB
263GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1384 1430 312 82 135 82 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
265% Outstanding
Read 2,115
Write 1,545
Mixed 1,256
SusWrite 571
305% 1,372 MB/s
4K Read 73.3
4K Write 201
4K Mixed 101
347% 125 MB/s
DQ Read 450
DQ Write 1,266
DQ Mixed 407
440% 707 MB/s
Poor: 99%
This bench: 265%
Great: 290%
Topmore ARIES 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 3.F.J.CC
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3558 4346 4377 4517 3925 2491 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
506% Outstanding
Read 2,464
Write 4138
Mixed 2,405
SusWrite 3,869
732% 3,219 MB/s
4K Read 63.2
4K Write 202
4K Mixed 88.9
317% 118 MB/s
DQ Read 1,768
DQ Write 1,536
DQ Mixed 1,680
1,252% 1,662 MB/s
Poor: 484%
This bench: 506%
Great: 506%
SDXC 512GB
190GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 15 36 58 14 25 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 10% Great: 46%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT16G48C40S5.M8A1 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
154% Outstanding
MC Read 62.9
MC Write 59.6
MC Mixed 57.3
171% 59.9 GB/s
SC Read 20.3
SC Write 49.8
SC Mixed 27.5
93% 32.5 GB/s
Latency 86.5
46% 86.5 ns
Poor: 113%
This bench: 154%
Great: 153%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X15 AT 23 Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 115%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 122%
UFO

System: Colorful X15 AT 23

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback