Fujitsu LIFEBOOK U7412

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics11.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
14 months ago, 14 months ago.
SystemFujitsu LIFEBOOK U7412  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU FJNB2F4
Memory36.7 GB free of 48 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221205
Uptime4 Days
Run DateApr 17 '23 at 12:13
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
12th Gen Intel Core i7-1270P
Onboard, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
67.4% Good
Memory 63.8
1-Core 132
2-Core 241
79% 146 Pts
4-Core 391
8-Core 507
57% 449 Pts
64-Core 702
44% 702 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 67.4%
Great: 95%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Device(1E26 009E) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4255
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
11.8% Very poor
Lighting 13.3
Reflection 14.7
Parallax 16.5
11% 14.8 fps
MRender 17.3
Gravity 19.8
Splatting 13.7
14% 16.9 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 11.8%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron_MTFDKBA512TFH_1BC15ABFA 512GB
236GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P7MA001
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,741
Write 616
Mixed 773
228% 1,043 MB/s
4K Read 39.5
4K Write 60.7
4K Mixed 46.3
151% 48.8 MB/s
DQ Read 196
DQ Write 161
DQ Mixed 203
145% 186 MB/s
Poor: 172% Great: 442%
SDXC 248GB
231GB free
Firmware: 0001
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 87.9
Write 53.5
Mixed 58.1
50% 66.5 MB/s
4K Read 4.7
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 3.5
603% 3.07 MB/s
Poor: 36% Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905744-101.A00G Hynix HMAA2GS6CJR8N-XN 47GB
3200, 3200 MHz
32767, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
68.7% Good
MC Read 25.7
MC Write 25.4
MC Mixed 24
72% 25 GB/s
SC Read 14.7
SC Write 27.2
SC Mixed 19.3
58% 20.4 GB/s
Latency 117
34% 117 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 68.7%
Great: 69%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical LIFEBOOK U7412 Builds (Compare 13 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu LIFEBOOK U7412

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $252Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback