Pcware IPMH510G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 92%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 86%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics104% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive78.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
14 months ago, 14 months ago.
SystemPcware IPMH510G  (all builds)
MotherboardPCWARE IPMH510G
Memory10.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211028
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 16 '23 at 17:16
Run Duration175 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 36%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-11400F-$104
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
90% Excellent
Memory 84.5
1-Core 149
2-Core 275
93% 169 Pts
4-Core 513
8-Core 838
83% 675 Pts
64-Core 1,109
69% 1,109 Pts
Poor: 88%
This bench: 90%
Great: 101%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$250
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 531.41
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Lighting 138
Reflection 128
Parallax 125
113% 130 fps
MRender 141
Gravity 98.5
Splatting 94.5
89% 111 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 104%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD WIN MEMORY 2 5 480 GB 480GB
144GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN11002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 167 57 12 189 29 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
78.6% Very good
Read 440
Write 460
Mixed 393
SusWrite 77.6
77% 343 MB/s
4K Read 38.4
4K Write 82.8
4K Mixed 43.6
158% 54.9 MB/s
DQ Read 213
DQ Write 128
DQ Mixed 20.6
56% 120 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 78.6%
Great: 99%
Seagate Expansion 2TB
69GB free
Firmware: 0502
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 40 40 42 40 40 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
26.2% Poor
Read 50.6
Write 36.7
Mixed 34.5
SusWrite 40.2
30% 40.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.9
157% 1 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 26.2%
Great: 67%
Innostor Ext. HDD 1TB
445GB free, PID 0621
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 97 97 96 96 96 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
38.7% Below average
Read 91.9
Write 83.9
Mixed 25.8
SusWrite 96.2
98% 74.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
70% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 38.7%
Great: 58%
Prolific ATAPI-6 Bridge C 4TB
69GB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 34 35 36 34 33 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
15.9% Very poor
Read 55.1
Write 30.2
Mixed 29.4
SusWrite 34
47% 37.2 MB/s
4K Read 2.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.6
29% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 15.9%
Great: 65%
Prolific ATAPI-6 Bridge C 4TB
451GB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.1 4.3 4.4 4.5 4.3 4.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
10.1% Very poor
Read 40.7
Write 27.2
Mixed 30.2
SusWrite 4.3
32% 25.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.3
48% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 10.1%
Great: 65%
Seagate Desktop 1.5TB
469GB free, PID 3300
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 37 37 39 38 38 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
16.6% Very poor
Read 51.4
Write 29.3
Mixed 19.2
SusWrite 37.5
43% 34.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.3
23% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 16.6%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BAS84U6DWA 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
47% Average
MC Read 17.7
MC Write 16.7
MC Mixed 13.4
46% 15.9 GB/s
SC Read 15.6
SC Write 14.2
SC Mixed 14.2
42% 14.7 GB/s
Latency 72.7
55% 72.7 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 47%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical IPMH510G Builds (Compare 212 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Pcware IPMH510G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $123
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback