Biostar H510MH 2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics61.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive36.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardBiostar H510MH 2.0  (all builds)
Memory11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210325
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateJan 25 '23 at 00:43
Run Duration105 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10700F-$180
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
85.7% Excellent
Memory 91.4
1-Core 108
2-Core 212
79% 137 Pts
4-Core 431
8-Core 726
70% 578 Pts
64-Core 1,071
66% 1,071 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 85.7%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3050-$250
Nvidia(10DE 163D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 528.02
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
61.7% Good
Lighting 79.3
Reflection 80.1
Parallax 85.5
65% 81.6 fps
MRender 79.8
Gravity 68
Splatting 61.4
56% 69.7 fps
Poor: 69%
This bench: 61.7%
Great: 79%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD WIN MEMORY 2 5 480 GB 480GB
217GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN11002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.3 5.9 199 7.2 7.5 202 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
36.5% Below average
Read 438
Write 464
Mixed 46
SusWrite 71.5
56% 255 MB/s
4K Read 24.5
4K Write 7.3
4K Mixed 7.6
51% 13.1 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 36.5%
Great: 99%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BAS84U6DWA 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
48.2% Average
MC Read 17.3
MC Write 17.2
MC Mixed 13.6
46% 16 GB/s
SC Read 13.1
SC Write 18.4
SC Mixed 15.5
45% 15.7 GB/s
Latency 65.1
61% 65.1 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 48.2%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H510MH 2.0 Builds (Compare 327 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Biostar H510MH 2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $503
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback