Performance Results


Gaming 62% Destroyer	Desktop 86% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 62% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	69.6% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	109% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon W-2245 471 User benchmarks, average bench 88% CPU0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	85.8% Excellent	Memory 73.8 1-Core 131 2-Core 257 84% 154 Pts	4-Core 524 8-Core 918 87% 721 Pts	64-Core 1,323 82% 1,323 Pts
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 85.8% Great: 94%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX A2000 12GB 1,128 User benchmarks, average bench 70% Legend(17AA 1611) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 511.65 Performing below potential (64^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	69.6% Good	Lighting 85.3 Reflection 95.7 Parallax 84.7 70% 88.6 fps	MRender 108 Gravity 76.2 Splatting 76.5 70% 87 fps
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 69.6% Great: 73%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Ssstc CVB-CD512 512GB 11 User benchmarks, average bench 99% 365GB free (System drive) Firmware: E197902 SusWrite @10s intervals: 344 268 261 278 278 278 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	109% Outstanding	Read 474 Write 390 Mixed 412 SusWrite 284 88% 390 MB/s	4K Read 35.3 4K Write 118 4K Mixed 53.7 185% 69.1 MB/s	DQ Read 361 DQ Write 339 DQ Mixed 130 158% 277 MB/s
Poor: 90% ↑ This bench: 109% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393A4K40DB2-CVF 2x31.5GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 2 of 4 slots used 63GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	59.6% Above average	MC Read 19.2 MC Write 29.5 MC Mixed 17.9 63% 22.2 GB/s	SC Read 7.7 SC Write 21 SC Mixed 11.5 38% 13.4 GB/s	Latency 92.8 43% 92.8 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 59.6% Great: 69%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 64%

Destroyer

Desktop 89%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 64%

Destroyer

CPU
Xeon W-2245IntelBench 88%, 471 samples	1x

GPU
RTX A2000 12GBNvidiaBench 70%, 1,128 samples	1x

SSD
CVB-CD512 512GBSsstcBench 99%, 11 samples	1x

RAM
M393A4K40DB2-CVF 2x31.5GBSamsungBench 57%, 8 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $38	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16