HP EliteBook x360 1030 G4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics4.14% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive95.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (56%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP EliteBook x360 1030 G4  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8637
Memory10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190821
Uptime5.1 Days
Run DateApr 16 '23 at 14:12
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User MAR-User
Background CPU 56%

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8265U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.95 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
45.3% Average
Memory 62.5
1-Core 60.3
2-Core 101
46% 74.6 Pts
4-Core 160
8-Core 185
22% 172 Pts
64-Core 196
12% 196 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 45.3%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620
HP(103C 8637) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1404
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
4.14% Terrible
Lighting 4.6
Reflection 5
Parallax 4.8
4% 4.8 fps
MRender 6.3
Gravity 4.1
Splatting 7.1
5% 5.83 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.14%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SK hynix BC501 HFM256GDJTNG-8310A 256GB
200GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80002C00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 385 326 328 307 304 297 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
95.6% Outstanding
Read 695
Write 455
Mixed 543
SusWrite 324
113% 504 MB/s
4K Read 25.3
4K Write 57.8
4K Mixed 26.6
103% 36.6 MB/s
DQ Read 510
DQ Write 235
DQ Mixed 380
280% 375 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 95.6%
Great: 164%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix CCNNNCLGALAR-NVD 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB Row of chips LPDDR3 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
51.1% Above average
MC Read 17.9
MC Write 20.5
MC Mixed 18
54% 18.8 GB/s
SC Read 8.2
SC Write 18.3
SC Mixed 13.2
38% 13.2 GB/s
Latency 120
33% 120 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 51.1%
Great: 70%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteBook x360 1030 G4 Builds (Compare 300 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook x360 1030 G4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback