Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 217%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 243%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (88th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 12 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 105%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics216% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory8.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20221028
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateApr 16 '23 at 07:39
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$249
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Memory 81.1
1-Core 178
2-Core 354
108% 204 Pts
4-Core 686
8-Core 1,299
118% 993 Pts
64-Core 2,194
136% 2,194 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 105%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-Ti-$660
Zotac(19DA 5618) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 531.61
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
216% Outstanding
Lighting 320
Reflection 290
Parallax 327
260% 312 fps
MRender 360
Gravity 267
Splatting 192
214% 273 fps
Poor: 162%
This bench: 216%
Great: 225%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
14GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,940
Write 1,153
Mixed 538
265% 1,210 MB/s
4K Read 48.3
4K Write 131
4K Mixed 44.2
199% 74.6 MB/s
DQ Read 996
DQ Write 761
DQ Mixed 763
602% 840 MB/s
Poor: 142% Great: 236%
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$95
189GB free
Firmware: SVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 37 37 37 37 37 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 82% Great: 137%
Mushkin MKNSSDEC1TB 1TB
100GB free
Firmware: P1003B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 37 36 37 37 37 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 62% Great: 95%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
929GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 190 192 189 192 186 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 203
Write 188
Mixed 113
SusWrite 189
127% 173 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1.2
243% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 112%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43BB2-CRC Adata AO2P24HC8T1-BTBS 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
93.6% Outstanding
MC Read 42.4
MC Write 31.6
MC Mixed 30.7
100% 34.9 GB/s
SC Read 24
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 28.4
67% 23.5 GB/s
Latency 78.5
51% 78.5 ns
Poor: 79%
This bench: 93.6%
Great: 94%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 26,033 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $185

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $1,023
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback