HP h8-1360t

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics5% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP h8-1360t  (all builds)
MotherboardPEGATRON 2AD5
Memory3.8 GB free of 10 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120702
Uptime32.2 Days
Run DateApr 16 '23 at 04:43
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 42%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
72.5% Very good
Memory 87.3
1-Core 82.5
2-Core 185
69% 118 Pts
4-Core 316
8-Core 429
47% 372 Pts
64-Core 468
29% 468 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 72.5%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7570
Device(1B0A 90B5) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1045.0
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
5% Terrible
Lighting 6.4
Reflection 6.4
Parallax 5.6
5% 6.13 fps
MRender 5.7
Gravity 5.3
Splatting 5.7
5% 5.57 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
352GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP33
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 37 41 36 23 61 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
13.9% Very poor
Read 5.7
Write 32
Mixed 21.3
SusWrite 41.7
19% 25.2 MB/s
4K Read 2.3
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.2
135% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 13.9%
Great: 112%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
203GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 99 100 105 97 101 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
61.1% Good
Read 112
Write 108
Mixed 80.9
SusWrite 100
74% 100 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1.1
210% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 61.1%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451U6AFR8A-PB HMT325U6CFR8C-PB HMT451U6AFR8A-PB 10GB
1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 2048, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
47.6% Average
MC Read 17.3
MC Write 16.5
MC Mixed 14.6
46% 16.1 GB/s
SC Read 12.8
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 15.1
42% 14.6 GB/s
Latency 70.2
57% 70.2 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 47.6%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical h8-1360t Builds (Compare 113 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: HP h8-1360t

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $381
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback