Asus PRIME X570-PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 181%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 205%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics196% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive247% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (63%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus PRIME X570-PRO  (all builds)
Memory25 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221027
Uptime1.8 Days
Run DateApr 15 '23 at 12:56
Run Duration244 Seconds
Run User ISR-User
Background CPU 63%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$395
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
93.2% Outstanding
Memory 82.4
1-Core 133
2-Core 273
88% 163 Pts
4-Core 556
8-Core 1,082
97% 819 Pts
64-Core 2,093
130% 2,093 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 93.2%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$879
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 531.61
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
196% Outstanding
Lighting 293
Reflection 249
Parallax 295
239% 279 fps
MRender 303
Gravity 231
Splatting 168
184% 234 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 196%
Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
XPG GAMMIX S11 Pro 1TB
352GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 32A0T2IA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 935 852 100 1221 992 947 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
247% Outstanding
Read 2,276
Write 1,813
Mixed 1,411
SusWrite 841
354% 1,585 MB/s
4K Read 47.2
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 61.4
205% 70.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,021
DQ Write 801
DQ Mixed 556
512% 792 MB/s
Poor: 185%
This bench: 247%
Great: 373%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
193GB free
Firmware: EMT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 365 415 433 457 459 460 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
100% Outstanding
Read 483
Write 439
Mixed 398
SusWrite 432
99% 438 MB/s
4K Read 33
4K Write 59
4K Mixed 46.1
140% 46 MB/s
DQ Read 249
DQ Write 198
DQ Mixed 220
166% 223 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 100%
Great: 134%
WDC WD40 EZAZ-19SF3B0 4TB
3TB free
Firmware: 80.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 77 77 77 76 77 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
13.2% Very poor
Read 88.1
Write 80.9
Mixed 62.9
SusWrite 77.1
17% 77.2 MB/s
4K Read 7.8
4K Write 8.5
4K Mixed 0.7
17% 5.67 MB/s
DQ Read 1.2
DQ Write 14.3
DQ Mixed 1.5
3% 5.67 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 13.2%
Great: 36%
Intel SSDPEKNW010T9 1TB
319GB free
Firmware: 001C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1186 1273 379 135 132 133 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
208% Outstanding
Read 1,610
Write 1,254
Mixed 1,080
SusWrite 540
250% 1,121 MB/s
4K Read 52.8
4K Write 124
4K Mixed 68
232% 81.4 MB/s
DQ Read 874
DQ Write 864
DQ Mixed 598
524% 779 MB/s
Poor: 139%
This bench: 208%
Great: 295%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79
757GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 108 113 113 108 108 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
74% Very good
Read 146
Write 153
Mixed 118
SusWrite 109
97% 131 MB/s
4K Read 7.4
4K Write 4.2
4K Mixed 0.7
464% 4.1 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 74%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMH32GX4M2D3600C18 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
111% Outstanding
MC Read 47.5
MC Write 41.1
MC Mixed 35.4
118% 41.3 GB/s
SC Read 25.9
SC Write 26.1
SC Mixed 33.8
82% 28.6 GB/s
Latency 76.2
52% 76.2 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 111%
Great: 124%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME X570-PRO Builds (Compare 5,401 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 184%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X570-PRO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $1,221
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $64G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback