Asus PRIME Z690-P WIFI D4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 117%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 120%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 127%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 121%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics93.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive393% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME Z690-P WIFI D4  (all builds)
Memory54.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221014
Uptime1.4 Days
Run DateApr 14 '23 at 09:30
Run Duration293 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-12700K-$215
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
121% Outstanding
Memory 93.3
1-Core 204
2-Core 404
123% 234 Pts
4-Core 790
8-Core 1,476
135% 1133 Pts
64-Core 2,351
146% 2,351 Pts
Poor: 102%
This bench: 121%
Great: 123%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$288
Gigabyte(1458 3FC1) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 531.61
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
93.7% Outstanding
Lighting 123
Reflection 122
Parallax 116
100% 120 fps
MRender 96.9
Gravity 111
Splatting 92
81% 99.9 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 93.7%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme WDS500G1X0E-00AFY0 500GB
297GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 613000WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3076 1930 861 829 859 803 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
393% Outstanding
Read 3,926
Write 3,420
Mixed 2,428
SusWrite 1393
623% 2,792 MB/s
4K Read 67.2
4K Write 146
4K Mixed 83.2
286% 98.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1198
DQ Write 1,629
DQ Mixed 1,363
1,044% 1,397 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 393%
Great: 520%
Nvme PNY CS2140 2TB SSD
962GB free
Firmware: CS214320 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2714 2582 2743 2007 1221 1219 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
307% Outstanding
Read 1,467
Write 2,724
Mixed 1,426
SusWrite 2,081
437% 1,924 MB/s
4K Read 43
4K Write 118
4K Mixed 57.8
202% 73.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,104
DQ Write 1,545
DQ Mixed 1,174
930% 1,274 MB/s
Poor: 197%
This bench: 307%
Great: 371%
Fujitsu SSD256GB 240GB
205GB free
Firmware: 5.2.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 227 197 189 202 189 192 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
67.5% Good
Read 347
Write 264
Mixed 263
SusWrite 199
60% 268 MB/s
4K Read 20.4
4K Write 52.2
4K Mixed 30.9
98% 34.5 MB/s
DQ Read 258
DQ Write 218
DQ Mixed 220
170% 232 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 67.5%
Great: 78%
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$87
3.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 155 157 151 155 150 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
70.7% Very good
Read 93.2
Write 146
Mixed 67.3
SusWrite 153
84% 115 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
84% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 70.7%
Great: 90%
Seagate Expansion Desk 4TB
2TB free
Firmware: 0915
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 157 162 159 161 167 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
73.3% Very good
Read 93.7
Write 154
Mixed 72.3
SusWrite 161
88% 120 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 4.2
4K Mixed 0.7
226% 2.2 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 73.3%
Great: 97%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF3600C16D4/16GX 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
117% Outstanding
MC Read 40.9
MC Write 44.1
MC Mixed 40.5
120% 41.8 GB/s
SC Read 27
SC Write 50.6
SC Mixed 36.3
108% 38 GB/s
Latency 61.5
65% 61.5 ns
Poor: 77%
This bench: 117%
Great: 134%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME Z690-P WIFI D4 Builds (Compare 9,821 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 177%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 114%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 195%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus PRIME Z690-P WIFI D4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $801
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback