Asus PRIME Z690-P WIFI D4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 109%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 117%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 121%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 118%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics89.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive368% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME Z690-P WIFI D4  (all builds)
Memory56.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221014
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 19 '23 at 02:23
Run Duration234 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-12700K-$215
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
118% Outstanding
Memory 86.7
1-Core 203
2-Core 402
120% 230 Pts
4-Core 799
8-Core 1,501
137% 1,150 Pts
64-Core 2,364
146% 2,364 Pts
Poor: 102%
This bench: 118%
Great: 123%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$288
Gigabyte(1458 3FC1) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 528.49
Performing below potential (43rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
89.1% Excellent
Lighting 117
Reflection 116
Parallax 112
95% 115 fps
MRender 95.1
Gravity 106
Splatting 86.3
78% 95.7 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 89.1%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme WDS500G1X0E-00AFY0 500GB
259GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 613000WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2919 1032 542 613 611 601 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
368% Outstanding
Read 3,850
Write 3,252
Mixed 2135
SusWrite 1,053
573% 2,573 MB/s
4K Read 65.9
4K Write 151
4K Mixed 84
288% 100 MB/s
DQ Read 1,215
DQ Write 1,536
DQ Mixed 1,302
1,003% 1,351 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 368%
Great: 520%
Nvme PNY CS2140 2TB SSD
967GB free
Firmware: CS214320 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2212 2809 2812 2153 1208 1209 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
284% Outstanding
Read 931
Write 475
Mixed 1,445
SusWrite 2,067
280% 1,230 MB/s
4K Read 43.4
4K Write 121
4K Mixed 57.9
204% 74 MB/s
DQ Read 1,129
DQ Write 1,454
DQ Mixed 1,201
932% 1,261 MB/s
Poor: 197%
This bench: 284%
Great: 371%
Fujitsu SSD256GB 240GB
205GB free
Firmware: 5.2.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 203 202 201 172 210 199 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
71.1% Very good
Read 370
Write 258
Mixed 263
SusWrite 198
61% 272 MB/s
4K Read 24.1
4K Write 59.7
4K Mixed 32.7
110% 38.8 MB/s
DQ Read 240
DQ Write 206
DQ Mixed 222
166% 222 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 71.1%
Great: 78%
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$87
4TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 147 149 147 151 148 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
63.2% Good
Read 72.2
Write 124
Mixed 64
SusWrite 148
75% 102 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
76% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 63.2%
Great: 90%
Seagate Expansion Desk 4TB
2TB free
Firmware: 0915
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 121 123 121 123 124 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
65.1% Good
Read 102
Write 159
Mixed 63.9
SusWrite 124
82% 112 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 0.7
218% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 65.1%
Great: 97%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF3600C16D4/16GX 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
117% Outstanding
MC Read 42.1
MC Write 44.1
MC Mixed 40.2
120% 42.1 GB/s
SC Read 27
SC Write 50.9
SC Mixed 36.1
108% 38 GB/s
Latency 70.7
57% 70.7 ns
Poor: 77%
This bench: 117%
Great: 134%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME Z690-P WIFI D4 Builds (Compare 9,821 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 177%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 114%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 195%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus PRIME Z690-P WIFI D4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $801
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback