Biostar A320MH

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics44.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive70.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardBiostar A320MH  (all builds)
Memory9.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200715
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateApr 13 '23 at 15:32
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$140
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
73% Very good
Memory 83.8
1-Core 105
2-Core 192
73% 127 Pts
4-Core 335
8-Core 588
56% 461 Pts
64-Core 754
47% 754 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 73%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 527.56
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
44.3% Average
Lighting 56.6
Reflection 57.5
Parallax 53.4
46% 55.8 fps
MRender 64.3
Gravity 51
Splatting 39.5
41% 51.6 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 44.3%
Great: 46%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS900 500GB SSD
83GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS900KA3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 302 23 20 23 26 22 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
70.8% Very good
Read 408
Write 214
Mixed 356
SusWrite 69.4
58% 262 MB/s
4K Read 28.3
4K Write 69.3
4K Mixed 34
123% 43.9 MB/s
DQ Read 219
DQ Write 335
DQ Mixed 168
158% 241 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 70.8%
Great: 96%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
PNY Electronics 8GBF1X08QFHH38-135-K 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
99.5% Outstanding
MC Read 41.1
MC Write 34.5
MC Mixed 33.9
104% 36.5 GB/s
SC Read 25.1
SC Write 31.5
SC Mixed 26.6
79% 27.7 GB/s
Latency 73.7
54% 73.7 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 99.5%
Great: 100%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320MH Builds (Compare 1,821 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Biostar A320MH

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $323
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback