Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 54% Yacht	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	2.27% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	39.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Gigabyte H110M-DS2
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-H110M-DS2-CF (all builds)
Memory	1.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20161116
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 13 '23 at 15:23
Run Duration	128 Seconds
Run User	VNM-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium G4560-$31 70,054 User benchmarks, average bench 57% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	56.1% Above average	Memory 77.8 1-Core 83.5 2-Core 115 58% 92.1 Pts	4-Core 204 8-Core 192 27% 198 Pts	64-Core 252 16% 252 Pts
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 56.1% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 610 (Desktop Kaby Lake) 14,881 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8280 Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	2.27% Terrible	Lighting 3.1 Reflection 2.6 Parallax 3.3 2% 3 fps	MRender 4.3 Gravity 3.2 Splatting 0 2% 2.5 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.27% Great: 3%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
IND-S325S/128GB 128GB 27 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 15GB free (System drive) Firmware: FW201105 SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 26 34 44 195 18 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	39.8% Below average	Read 369 Write 17.9 Mixed 280 SusWrite 58.8 40% 181 MB/s	4K Read 12.8 4K Write 21.3 4K Mixed 11 45% 15 MB/s	DQ Read 108 DQ Write 250 DQ Mixed 17.8 60% 125 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 39.8% Great: 76%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown GLJG42F-D8KFFG------ 1x8GB 43 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (18^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	34.5% Below average	MC Read 12.7 MC Write 12.3 MC Mixed 11 34% 12 GB/s	SC Read 8.1 SC Write 7.7 SC Mixed 8.7 23% 8.17 GB/s	Latency 84.8 47% 84.8 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 34.5% Great: 44%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 21%

Surfboard

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 17%

Surfboard

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	307x
HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples	174x
HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples	148x

RAM
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	46x
Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x4GBHyperX $67Bench 69%, 46,617 samples	31x
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	27x

Value: 89% - Excellent

Total price: $157