Asus BM6820_BM6620_BP6320-8

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (4th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 96 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 20.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive12.4% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (93%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus BM6820_BM6620_BP6320-8  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK BM6820_BM6620_BP6320-8
Memory0.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130104
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateApr 13 '23 at 11:33
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 93%

 PC Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-3220-$60
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
20.8% Poor
Memory 22.9
1-Core 19.2
2-Core 38.7
16% 26.9 Pts
4-Core 104
8-Core 128
15% 116 Pts
64-Core 125
8% 125 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 20.8%
Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
407GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 73 75 83 74 71 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
12.4% Very poor
Read 77.6
Write 82.3
Mixed 75
SusWrite 73.1
17% 77 MB/s
4K Read 4
4K Write 6
4K Mixed 4.7
15% 4.9 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 12.4%
Great: 129%
Realtek RTL9210 NVME 512GB
69GB free, PID 9210
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 20 20 20 20 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
13.2% Very poor
Read 54.9
Write 20.4
Mixed 21.9
SusWrite 19.8
34% 29.2 MB/s
4K Read 4.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 1.6
70% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13.2%
Great: 80%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HY64C1B0823ZY 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
28.5% Poor
MC Read 12.2
MC Write 12
MC Mixed 10.8
33% 11.7 GB/s
SC Read 2.8
SC Write 3.7
SC Mixed 1.2
7% 2.57 GB/s
Latency 300
13% 300 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 28.5%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical BM6820_BM6620_BP6320-8 Builds (Compare 78 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Asus BM6820_BM6620_BP6320-8

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $59
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback