Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 32% Sail boat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	2.07% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	31.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-4030U 24,177 User benchmarks, average bench 45% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.9 GHz, turbo 1.9 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	31.3% Below average	Memory 43.2 1-Core 40.3 2-Core 81.2 33% 54.9 Pts	4-Core 112 8-Core 120 15% 116 Pts	64-Core 120 7% 120 Pts
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 31.3% Great: 54%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz) 275,372 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Legend(17AA 3978) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4642 Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	2.07% Terrible	Lighting 2.5 Reflection 1.7 Parallax 4 2% 2.73 fps	MRender 2.1 Gravity 2 Splatting 3.4 2% 2.5 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.07% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Midasforce 128GB 128GB 609 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 34GB free (System drive) Firmware: U0326A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 36 48 50 41 44 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	31.7% Below average	Read 410 Write 113 Mixed 55 SusWrite 45.9 34% 156 MB/s	4K Read 15.3 4K Write 3.5 4K Mixed 11.9 40% 10.2 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 31.7% Great: 155%
Hitachi HTS545050A7E680 500GB 66,048 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 234GB free Firmware: GR2OA3B0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 91 90 94 98 98 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	55.4% Above average	Read 100 Write 87.2 Mixed 36.3 SusWrite 92.8 58% 79.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.5 104% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 55.4% Great: 58%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 8KTF51264HZ-1G6E1 TI9C5S05H41159 8GB 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	26.1% Poor	MC Read 8 MC Write 10.4 MC Mixed 9.5 27% 9.3 GB/s	SC Read 5.8 SC Write 8.1 SC Mixed 8.4 21% 7.43 GB/s	Latency 188 21% 188 ns

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 44%

Speed boat

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 275,372 samples	6x

SSD
V800/120G 120GBVasekyBench 60%, 655 samples	1x
PLUS 480GBSandiskBench 48%, 58,990 samples	1x
SL300 120GBColorfulBench 61%, 1,356 samples	1x

RAM
RMT3170EF68F9W1600 2x4GBRamaxelBench 47%, 1,656 samples	1x
RMT3170ME68F9F1600 Samsung M471B5173DB0-YK0 8GBUnknownBench 46%, 107 samples	1x
16KTF1G64HZ-1G6E1 Hynix HMT451S6AFR8A-PB 12GBMicronBench 41%, 120 samples	1x