HP OMEN Laptop 15-ek0xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 73%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics81.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemHP OMEN Laptop 15-ek0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 878A
Memory7.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220418
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 13 '23 at 01:20
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
86.2% Excellent
Memory 87.9
1-Core 123
2-Core 252
86% 154 Pts
4-Core 455
8-Core 714
72% 585 Pts
64-Core 855
53% 855 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 86.2%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design
HP(103C 878A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 531.41
Performing below potential (69th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
81.8% Excellent
Lighting 98.9
Reflection 106
Parallax 113
81% 106 fps
MRender 135
Gravity 93.6
Splatting 87.9
84% 105 fps
Poor: 62%
This bench: 81.8%
Great: 90%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate One Touch SSD 2TB
26GB free
Firmware: PMAP
SusWrite @10s intervals: 318 348 115 101 346 349 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
55.5% Above average
Read 322
Write 350
Mixed 273
SusWrite 263
68% 302 MB/s
4K Read 17.5
4K Write 34.9
4K Mixed 21.7
73% 24.7 MB/s
DQ Read 89.5
DQ Write 86.9
DQ Mixed 69.1
57% 81.8 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 55.5%
Great: 98%
Samsung PSSD T7 1TB
21GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 214 252 158 94 101 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
43% Average
Read 293
Write 297
Mixed 188
SusWrite 155
52% 233 MB/s
4K Read 14.4
4K Write 26
4K Mixed 18.1
59% 19.5 MB/s
DQ Read 91.5
DQ Write 63.4
DQ Mixed 104
70% 86.2 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 43%
Great: 96%
Intel HBRPEKNX0202AH 512GB
3GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS2
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,154
Write 866
Mixed 752
690% 924 MB/s
4K Read 41.6
4K Write 80.6
4K Mixed 52.7
9,082% 58.3 MB/s
DQ Read 334
DQ Write 492
DQ Mixed 342
3,345% 389 MB/s
Poor: 4% Great: 98%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6DJR8N-XN 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
78.1% Very good
MC Read 31.1
MC Write 30.9
MC Mixed 23.9
82% 28.6 GB/s
SC Read 16.5
SC Write 22.1
SC Mixed 19.7
56% 19.4 GB/s
Latency 69.6
58% 69.6 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 78.1%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical OMEN Laptop 15-ek0xxx Builds (Compare 2,251 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht

System: HP OMEN Laptop 15-ek0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback