MSI B560M BOMBER (MS-7D20)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics14% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive290% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
14 months ago, 13 months ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7D20
MotherboardMSI B560M BOMBER (MS-7D20)  (all builds)
Memory23.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220112
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 12 '23 at 18:35
Run Duration240 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10400F-$98
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
87% Excellent
Memory 90
1-Core 121
2-Core 235
84% 149 Pts
4-Core 452
8-Core 728
72% 590 Pts
64-Core 880
54% 880 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 87%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030
Zotac(19DA 2476) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 528.49
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
14% Very poor
Lighting 17.5
Reflection 17.4
Parallax 17.6
14% 17.5 fps
MRender 14.9
Gravity 18.5
Splatting 16.2
14% 16.5 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$90
191GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1992 2098 1759 651 655 660 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
290% Outstanding
Read 2,422
Write 2,256
Mixed 2,177
SusWrite 1,302
458% 2,039 MB/s
4K Read 55.3
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 74.4
239% 80.6 MB/s
DQ Read 931
DQ Write 834
DQ Mixed 897
669% 887 MB/s
Poor: 206%
This bench: 290%
Great: 442%
External USB3.0 DISK00 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 130 129 130 131 129 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
56.5% Above average
Read 136
Write 136
Mixed 63
SusWrite 130
155% 116 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 0.9
126% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 56.5%
Great: 68%
External USB3.0 DISK01 3TB
2TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 17 18 19 20 20 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
31.7% Below average
Read 149
Write 157
Mixed 46
SusWrite 18.5
114% 92.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.6
88% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 31.7%
Great: 60%
External USB3.0 DISK02 6TB
5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 133 139 151 157 157 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
62% Good
Read 167
Write 172
Mixed 57.6
SusWrite 146
179% 136 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1
102% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 62%
Great: 72%
External USB3.0 DISK03 6TB
2TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.1 0.1 0 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
42.1% Average
Read 176
Write 197
Mixed 68.8
SusWrite 0
136% 110 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 5.3
4K Mixed 1.9
250% 2.83 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 42.1%
Great: 75%
External USB3.0 DISK04 4TB
448GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.5 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
11.6% Very poor
Read 60.8
Write 128
Mixed 56
SusWrite 0.2
84% 61.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.3
42% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 11.6%
Great: 64%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF3200C16D4/16GX 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
79.2% Very good
MC Read 29.3
MC Write 30.5
MC Mixed 24.7
80% 28.2 GB/s
SC Read 15.3
SC Write 31.8
SC Mixed 23.7
67% 23.6 GB/s
Latency 67.2
60% 67.2 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 79.2%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B560M BOMBER (MS-7D20) Builds (Compare 101 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

Motherboard: MSI B560M BOMBER (MS-7D20)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $310
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback