Fujitsu LIFEBOOK E559

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.88% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive81.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemFujitsu LIFEBOOK E559  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU FJNB2CA
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20221207
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 11 '23 at 11:20
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User ZAF-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8265U
Onboard, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
60.1% Good
Memory 76.8
1-Core 88.4
2-Core 156
63% 107 Pts
4-Core 237
8-Core 335
36% 286 Pts
64-Core 350
22% 350 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 60.1%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620
Device(1E26 0023) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9864
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
3.88% Terrible
Lighting 4.1
Reflection 3.8
Parallax 4.4
3% 4.1 fps
MRender 7.3
Gravity 4.2
Splatting 6.5
5% 6 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.88%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MTFDDAV512TDL-1AW15ABFA 512GB
268GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M5MA030
SusWrite @10s intervals: 292 273 323 271 263 255 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
81.8% Excellent
Read 365
Write 297
Mixed 329
SusWrite 280
71% 318 MB/s
4K Read 27.3
4K Write 53.8
4K Mixed 33.4
113% 38.2 MB/s
DQ Read 358
DQ Write 324
DQ Mixed 343
257% 341 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 81.8%
Great: 101%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1G44BB0-CWE 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
56.6% Above average
MC Read 21.3
MC Write 21
MC Mixed 17.3
57% 19.9 GB/s
SC Read 12.4
SC Write 22.8
SC Mixed 17.8
50% 17.7 GB/s
Latency 86.7
46% 86.7 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 56.6%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical LIFEBOOK E559 Builds (Compare 33 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu LIFEBOOK E559

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback