HP OMEN by HP Laptop 17-an0xx

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics29.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP OMEN by HP Laptop 17-an0xx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8392
Memory11 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit barev,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210705
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 11 '23 at 09:20
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
55.6% Above average
Memory 53.4
1-Core 91.8
2-Core 176
59% 107 Pts
4-Core 313
8-Core 438
47% 375 Pts
64-Core 491
30% 491 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 55.6%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti (Mobile)
HP(103C 8392) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.3141
Performing below potential (54th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
29.1% Poor
Lighting 37.2
Reflection 38.3
Parallax 25.2
30% 33.6 fps
MRender 37.7
Gravity 38
Splatting 25.7
27% 33.8 fps
Poor: 21%
This bench: 29.1%
Great: 31%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB
30GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXB73H1Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,228
Write 912
Mixed 647
205% 929 MB/s
4K Read 34
4K Write 52.4
4K Mixed 37.6
127% 41.3 MB/s
DQ Read 407
DQ Write 303
DQ Mixed 382
278% 364 MB/s
Poor: 106% Great: 236%
Seagate ST1000LM049-2GH172 1TB
279GB free
Firmware: RXM3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 118 120 121 120 119 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
74.1% Very good
Read 139
Write 146
Mixed 72.2
SusWrite 119
87% 119 MB/s
4K Read 2.1
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1
230% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 74.1%
Great: 95%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5700-027.A00G HP26D4S9S8MH-8 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
40.7% Average
MC Read 15
MC Write 17.4
MC Mixed 14.2
44% 15.5 GB/s
SC Read 6.2
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 8.7
22% 7.8 GB/s
Latency 149
27% 149 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 40.7%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical OMEN by HP Laptop 17-an0xx Builds (Compare 1,454 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: HP OMEN by HP Laptop 17-an0xx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback