Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 40% Jet ski	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	4.27% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	13.5% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (49%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

2 years ago, 13 months ago.

PC Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A10-4600M APU 5,886 User benchmarks, average bench 43% Socket FS1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	39.8% Below average	Memory 62.9 1-Core 40.6 2-Core 71 38% 58.2 Pts	4-Core 98.4 8-Core 107 14% 103 Pts	64-Core 107 7% 107 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 39.8% Great: 51%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7660G 4,227 User benchmarks, average bench 4% HP(103C 180F) 768MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.1901.0 Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	4.27% Terrible	Lighting 5 Reflection 4.5 Parallax 5.9 4% 5.13 fps	MRender 4.9 Gravity 5.3 Splatting 6.5 5% 5.57 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.27% Great: 5%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38 237,487 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 234GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFKB1C2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 17 17 6.5 9.6 9.6 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	13.5% Very poor	Read 106 Write 85.2 Mixed 62.7 SusWrite 34.5 16% 72.2 MB/s	4K Read 8.2 4K Write 6.8 4K Mixed 5.9 24% 6.97 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 13.5% Great: 102%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CT102464BF160B.C16 859B CT102464BF160B.M16 16GB 72 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance (0^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	26.5% Poor	MC Read 12.4 MC Write 5.5 MC Mixed 9.8 26% 9.23 GB/s	SC Read 6.2 SC Write 5.1 SC Mixed 8.7 19% 6.67 GB/s	Latency 119 34% 119 ns
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 26.5% Great: 59%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 38%

Jet ski

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

RAM
M471B5173BH0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 26%, 3,518 samples	4x
M471B5173QH0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 25%, 38,580 samples	2x
M471B5773DH0-CH9 2x2GBSamsungBench 37%, 7,983 samples	2x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16