bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics74.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive39.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced.
MotherboardMicrosoft Virtual Machine
Memory8.3 GB free of 11.9648 GB @ 0 GHz
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191101
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 10 '23 at 11:43
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon Silver 4114
None, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
57.1% Above average
Memory 65.5
1-Core 75.8
2-Core 146
56% 95.9 Pts
4-Core 263
8-Core 483
45% 373 Pts
64-Core 811
50% 811 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 57.1%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX A2000
Device(0000 0000)
Driver: Ver. 10.0.19041.1
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
74.7% Very good
Lighting 95.5
Reflection 103
Parallax 91.9
78% 96.9 fps
MRender 109
Gravity 73.6
Splatting 74.7
69% 85.8 fps
Poor: 62%
This bench: 74.7%
Great: 76%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Виртуальный диск (Майкрософт) 239GB
194GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 227 261 276 284 278 288 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
39.8% Below average
Read 220
Write 264
Mixed 230
SusWrite 269
56% 246 MB/s
4K Read 7.8
4K Write 11.6
4K Mixed 9.1
30% 9.5 MB/s
DQ Read 161
DQ Write 81.1
DQ Mixed 112
86% 118 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Microsoft Corporation None Corporation None 11GB
0, 0 MHz
3072, 9180 MB
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
33.1% Below average
MC Read 15.3
MC Write 9.8
MC Mixed 11.6
35% 12.2 GB/s
SC Read 7.1
SC Write 5.4
SC Mixed 5.4
17% 5.97 GB/s
Latency 112
36% 112 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 33.1%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,481 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback