Thunderobot 911MT ST

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics39.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive183% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemThunderobot 911MT ST  (all builds)
MotherboardTHUNDEROBOT NH58DXQ-H
Memory12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200512
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 08 '23 at 17:37
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10200H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
75.3% Very good
Memory 90.5
1-Core 112
2-Core 209
79% 137 Pts
4-Core 328
8-Core 455
49% 391 Pts
64-Core 482
30% 482 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 75.3%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650
Clevo(1558 8535) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.3141
Performing below potential (46th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
39.5% Below average
Lighting 50.8
Reflection 73.4
Parallax 43.2
41% 55.8 fps
MRender 60
Gravity 37.9
Splatting 37.4
36% 45.1 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 39.5%
Great: 43%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kimtigo 512GB 512GB
395GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1111C0L
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1271 349 669 598 315 360 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
183% Outstanding
Read 1,586
Write 1,466
Mixed 1032
SusWrite 594
261% 1,169 MB/s
4K Read 42.8
4K Write 116
4K Mixed 27.4
162% 62.2 MB/s
DQ Read 894
DQ Write 730
DQ Mixed 520
469% 715 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 183%
Great: 275%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB
835GB free
Firmware: 04.01A04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 104 104 102 104 103 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
61.9% Good
Read 112
Write 86.6
Mixed 66.3
SusWrite 103
68% 91.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 3.4
4K Mixed 0.7
191% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 61.9%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TMKS8G68AHFHD-32A 0710 TMKS8G68ALFBCH-2933Y 16GB
2933, 2933 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
81.2% Excellent
MC Read 31.2
MC Write 31.5
MC Mixed 23.4
82% 28.7 GB/s
SC Read 16.4
SC Write 34.2
SC Mixed 24.9
72% 25.2 GB/s
Latency 66.5
60% 66.5 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 81.2%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 911MT ST Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Thunderobot 911MT ST

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback