Thunderobot 911MT ST

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics36.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive163% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemThunderobot 911MT ST  (all builds)
MotherboardTHUNDEROBOT NH58DXQ-H
Memory10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200512
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateApr 08 '23 at 17:31
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10200H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
66.7% Good
Memory 71.6
1-Core 113
2-Core 209
73% 131 Pts
4-Core 343
8-Core 429
50% 386 Pts
64-Core 478
30% 478 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 66.7%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650
Clevo(1558 8535) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.3141
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
36.7% Below average
Lighting 46.7
Reflection 67
Parallax 41.3
38% 51.7 fps
MRender 57.6
Gravity 35.4
Splatting 35.6
34% 42.9 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 36.7%
Great: 43%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kimtigo 512GB 512GB
394GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1111C0L
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1053 1058 522 335 546 272 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
163% Outstanding
Read 1,339
Write 1,210
Mixed 895
SusWrite 631
228% 1,019 MB/s
4K Read 33.1
4K Write 91.2
4K Mixed 23.3
128% 49.2 MB/s
DQ Read 852
DQ Write 643
DQ Mixed 523
452% 673 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 163%
Great: 275%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB
835GB free
Firmware: 04.01A04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 106 100 102 103 103 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
65.2% Good
Read 124
Write 93.9
Mixed 65
SusWrite 102
71% 96.2 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 0.4
166% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 65.2%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TMKS8G68AHFHD-32A 0710 TMKS8G68ALFBCH-2933Y 16GB
2933, 2933 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
54.7% Above average
MC Read 22.6
MC Write 21.3
MC Mixed 17.3
58% 20.4 GB/s
SC Read 9
SC Write 14.9
SC Mixed 12.1
34% 12 GB/s
Latency 97.7
41% 97.7 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 54.7%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 911MT ST Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Thunderobot 911MT ST

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback