Asus M4A87TD EVO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics7.17% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive35.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus M4A87TD EVO  (all builds)
Memory6 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100519
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 30 '17 at 20:48
Run Duration283 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 35%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X6 1055T-$175
AM3, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
58.5% Above average
Memory 89.4
1-Core 44.4
2-Core 83.1
49% 72.3 Pts
4-Core 153
8-Core 213
23% 183 Pts
64-Core 219
14% 219 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 58.5%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTS 250
MSI(1462 1543) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.1
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
7.17% Terrible
Lighting 9.8
Reflection 9.38
Parallax 3.5
8% 7.56 fps
MRender 7.62
Gravity 7.3
Splatting 5.91
6% 6.94 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 7.17%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair Force 3 120GB-$109
92GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5.02 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
35.5% Below average
Read 148
Write 102
Mixed 112
27% 121 MB/s
4K Read 19.2
4K Write 46.5
4K Mixed 8.07
64% 24.6 MB/s
DQ Read 119
DQ Write 110
DQ Mixed 29.2
45% 86.4 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 35.5%
Great: 61%
WD Black 750GB (2008)-$140
698GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
69.8% Good
Read 126
Write 117
Mixed 116
90% 120 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.24
4K Mixed 0.5
146% 1.31 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 69.8%
Great: 65%
SanDisk Cruzer Force 32GB
14GB free, PID 557d
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
8.92% Terrible
Read 20.1
Write 5.97
Mixed 7.53
12% 11.2 MB/s
4K Read 3.65
4K Write 1.25
4K Mixed 0.88
86% 1.92 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 8.92%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMX4GX3M2A1600C7 CMX4GX3M2A1600C7 CMX4GX3M2A1600C9 CMX4GX3M2A1600C9 8GB
667, 667, 667, 667 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
32.4% Below average
MC Read 13.7
MC Write 6.9
MC Mixed 11.9
31% 10.8 GB/s
SC Read 7
SC Write 6.6
SC Mixed 9
22% 7.53 GB/s
Latency 68
59% 68 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 32.4%
Great: 35%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M4A87TD EVO Builds (Compare 136 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M4A87TD EVO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $241
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback