Dell Precision T7600

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 135%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 149%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics186% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive58.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory88GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 88GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemDell Precision T7600
MotherboardDell Precision T7600  (all builds)
Memory84.2 GB free of 88 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190630
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 08 '23 at 02:37
Run Duration326 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 0
CPU 1, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
74.6% Very good
Memory 83.9
1-Core 92.9
2-Core 185
70% 121 Pts
4-Core 352
8-Core 652
60% 502 Pts
64-Core 1719
106% 1719 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 74.6%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,198
CLim: 2205 MHz, MLim: 4875 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 531.41
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
186% Outstanding
Lighting 256
Reflection 307
Parallax 340
208% 301 fps
MRender 338
Gravity 254
Splatting 192
206% 261 fps
Poor: 185%
This bench: 186%
Great: 230%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$76
269GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 238 240 239 239 240 240 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
58.4% Above average
Read 247
Write 230
Mixed 225
SusWrite 239
53% 235 MB/s
4K Read 23.2
4K Write 31.2
4K Mixed 26.3
85% 26.9 MB/s
DQ Read 177
DQ Write 149
DQ Mixed 163
122% 163 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 58.4%
Great: 134%
WD Blue SA510 2.5 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: 0100
SusWrite @10s intervals: 241 242 240 240 181 220 MB/s
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
55.7% Above average
Read 240
Write 225
Mixed 229
SusWrite 227
52% 230 MB/s
4K Read 21
4K Write 31.1
4K Mixed 24.5
80% 25.5 MB/s
DQ Read 181
DQ Write 150
DQ Mixed 154
118% 162 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 55.7%
Great: 112%
CT1000P3SSD8 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: P9CR30A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1807 1853 1711 1711 1719 1702 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
210% Outstanding
Read 1,102
Write 1,735
Mixed 1,376
SusWrite 1,750
339% 1491 MB/s
4K Read 29
4K Write 74.3
4K Mixed 41.8
137% 48.4 MB/s
DQ Read 454
DQ Write 270
DQ Mixed 374
276% 366 MB/s
Poor: 102%
This bench: 210%
Great: 394%
CT1000P3SSD8 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: P9CR30A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1787 1781 1769 1778 1773 1773 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
230% Outstanding
Read 1,557
Write 1,809
Mixed 1,661
SusWrite 1,777
385% 1,701 MB/s
4K Read 28.6
4K Write 77.6
4K Mixed 41.7
138% 49.3 MB/s
DQ Read 470
DQ Write 272
DQ Mixed 392
286% 378 MB/s
Poor: 102%
This bench: 230%
Great: 394%
CT1000P3SSD8 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: P9CR30A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1763 1770 1769 1764 1765 1766 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
230% Outstanding
Read 1,551
Write 1,800
Mixed 1,670
SusWrite 1,766
384% 1,697 MB/s
4K Read 28.6
4K Write 78.3
4K Mixed 41.8
138% 49.6 MB/s
DQ Read 498
DQ Write 273
DQ Mixed 396
292% 389 MB/s
Poor: 102%
This bench: 230%
Great: 394%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
931GB free
Firmware: 1A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 173 173 174 174 172 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
98.6% Outstanding
Read 170
Write 153
Mixed 99.6
SusWrite 173
109% 149 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.2
225% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 98.6%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung-00CE M393B5273DH0-CK0 M393B5273DH0-CK0 Micron-002C 36KSF2G72PZ-1G6E1 M393B5270DH0-CK0 M393B5273DH0-YK0 M393B5273DH0-CK0 Micron-002C 36KSF2G72PZ-1G6E1 M393B5270DH0-CK0... 88GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 16384, 4096, 4096, 4096, 16384, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
51.1% Above average
MC Read 22.1
MC Write 17.6
MC Mixed 16.7
54% 18.8 GB/s
SC Read 15.1
SC Write 6.8
SC Mixed 7.6
28% 9.83 GB/s
Latency 73.6
54% 73.6 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 51.1%
Great: 96%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Precision T7600 Builds (Compare 701 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Dell Precision T7600

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 30% - Poor Total price: $76
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback