MSI MS-14D3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics16.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
14 months ago, 14 months ago.
SystemMicro-Star Modern 14 B11MO
MotherboardMSI MS-14D3  (all builds)
Memory18.1 GB free of 24 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211230
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 07 '23 at 21:25
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
11th Gen Intel Core i5-1155G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
70.2% Very good
Memory 58.3
1-Core 151
2-Core 257
83% 156 Pts
4-Core 444
8-Core 615
67% 530 Pts
64-Core 600
37% 600 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 70.2%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
MSI(1462 12E6) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.4255
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
16.9% Very poor
Lighting 20.9
Reflection 23.8
Parallax 24.7
17% 23.1 fps
MRender 19.6
Gravity 26.2
Splatting 16.6
17% 20.8 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 16.9%
Great: 20%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron_2210_MTFDHBA512QFD 512GB
339GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P6MA001
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,447
Write 1,028
Mixed 904
249% 1,126 MB/s
4K Read 56.3
4K Write 147
4K Mixed 75.7
260% 92.9 MB/s
DQ Read 609
DQ Write 656
DQ Mixed 263
300% 509 MB/s
Poor: 102% Great: 247%
SDXC Card 64GB
42GB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 25.4
Write 21.6
Mixed 21.5
29% 22.8 MB/s
4K Read 5.5
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.3
34% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 7% Great: 41%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-3G2R1 G Skill Intl F4-3200C22-16GRS 24GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 16384 MB
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
70.6% Very good
MC Read 26.5
MC Write 31.5
MC Mixed 22.3
76% 26.8 GB/s
SC Read 10.8
SC Write 26.6
SC Mixed 13.4
48% 16.9 GB/s
Latency 133
30% 133 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 70.6%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-14D3 Builds (Compare 502 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-14D3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback