Acer ConceptD CN315-71

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics4.97% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive245% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAcer ConceptD CN315-71  (all builds)
MotherboardCFL PidgeyC_CFS
Memory26.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20201117
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 06 '23 at 23:28
Run Duration218 Seconds
Run User MAR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
82.8% Excellent
Memory 91.1
1-Core 96.8
2-Core 233
79% 140 Pts
4-Core 402
8-Core 580
62% 491 Pts
64-Core 688
43% 688 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 82.8%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Acer(1025 1397) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2115
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
4.97% Terrible
Lighting 6.2
Reflection 63.8
Parallax 8.5
5% 26.2 fps
MRender 13.2
Gravity 6.8
Splatting 0.3
5% 6.77 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.97%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB
327GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1792 915 604 602 603 606 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
245% Outstanding
Read 2,314
Write 1,892
Mixed 1,559
SusWrite 854
370% 1,655 MB/s
4K Read 53.1
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 67.9
221% 74.1 MB/s
DQ Read 813
DQ Write 606
DQ Mixed 696
524% 705 MB/s
Poor: 130%
This bench: 245%
Great: 296%
Crucial P2 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$99
309GB free
Firmware: R033 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1659 1570 69 66 65 273 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
186% Outstanding
Read 1,206
Write 1,692
Mixed 1,268
SusWrite 617
270% 1,196 MB/s
4K Read 48.6
4K Write 120
4K Mixed 65.1
220% 77.9 MB/s
DQ Read 712
DQ Write 686
DQ Mixed 803
575% 734 MB/s
Poor: 84%
This bench: 186%
Great: 299%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB
405GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 90 90 87 89 89 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
58.8% Above average
Read 116
Write 94.4
Mixed 63.3
SusWrite 88.3
66% 90.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 0.5
185% 2 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 58.8%
Great: 79%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
209GB free, PID a207
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 39 39 39 39 39 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
16.9% Very poor
Read 53.1
Write 33.1
Mixed 18.7
SusWrite 38.7
45% 35.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.3
20% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 16.9%
Great: 49%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown AO1P32MCST2-BW4S Kingston ACR26D4S9D8ME-16 32GB
2667, 2667 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
83% Excellent
MC Read 30.6
MC Write 32.1
MC Mixed 25.3
84% 29.3 GB/s
SC Read 16.1
SC Write 36.1
SC Mixed 25.4
74% 25.9 GB/s
Latency 65.6
61% 65.6 ns
Poor: 83%
This bench: 83%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ConceptD CN315-71 Builds (Compare 39 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Acer ConceptD CN315-71

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback