Asus ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506LH_FX506LH

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics5.18% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
14 months ago, 14 months ago.
SystemAsus ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506LH_FX506LH  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX506LH
Memory7.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211126
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 06 '23 at 08:14
Run Duration80 Seconds
Run User THA-User
Background CPU 23%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
78.7% Very good
Memory 81.3
1-Core 122
2-Core 229
81% 144 Pts
4-Core 410
8-Core 622
64% 516 Pts
64-Core 634
39% 634 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 78.7%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Asus(1043 177F) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2115
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
5.18% Terrible
Lighting 5.8
Reflection 53.5
Parallax 6.9
5% 22.1 fps
MRender 6.3
Gravity 5.6
Splatting 9.4
6% 7.1 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.18%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron_2210_MTFDHBA512QFD 512GB
36GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P6MA007
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1419
Write 1,068
Mixed 937
253% 1,141 MB/s
4K Read 50.3
4K Write 91.5
4K Mixed 60.3
202% 67.4 MB/s
DQ Read 609
DQ Write 590
DQ Mixed 240
279% 480 MB/s
Poor: 102% Great: 247%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HKED4162CAB1D0GA1 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
39.4% Below average
MC Read 14.2
MC Write 13.8
MC Mixed 11.1
37% 13 GB/s
SC Read 11.7
SC Write 14.2
SC Mixed 13.3
37% 13.1 GB/s
Latency 78.2
51% 78.2 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 39.4%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506LH_FX506LH Builds (Compare 5,226 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Asus ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506LH_FX506LH

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback