Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (7th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 93 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive	29.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (70%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon II X2 255 3,508 User benchmarks, average bench 42% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	32.4% Below average	Memory 56.2 1-Core 40.7 2-Core 54.7 34% 50.5 Pts	4-Core 52.1 8-Core 57.3 7% 54.7 Pts	64-Core 58.6 4% 58.6 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 32.4% Great: 49%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Addlink SATA SSD 120GB 367 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 77GB free (System drive) Firmware: HPS2227P SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 166 166 165 163 164 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	29.9% Poor	Read 148 Write 137 Mixed 138 SusWrite 163 33% 147 MB/s	4K Read 12.4 4K Write 24 4K Mixed 7.7 41% 14.7 MB/s	DQ Read 27.7 DQ Write 55.1 DQ Mixed 14.2 18% 32.3 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 29.9% Great: 91%
Toshiba 2.5"External Har 500GB 54 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 272GB free, PID 0b1f Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 27 27 27 27 27 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	13.3% Very poor	Read 49.7 Write 26.7 Mixed 23.5 SusWrite 26.8 39% 31.7 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0.7 28% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 13.3% Great: 37%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 16GB 70,565 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 800, 800 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	19.8% Very poor	MC Read 7.3 MC Write 4.9 MC Mixed 7.6 19% 6.6 GB/s	SC Read 5.1 SC Write 4.9 SC Mixed 7.4 17% 5.8 GB/s	Latency 139 29% 139 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 19.8% Great: 54%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 41%

Speed boat

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

GPU
Radeon 3000 GraphicsATIBench 1%, 21,841 samples	2x
GTX 650Nvidia $112Bench 8%, 69,673 samples	2x
GTX 550-TiNvidia $250Bench 9%, 54,392 samples	2x

Value: 65% - Good

Total price: $70

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16