Acer Aspire X3900

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.81% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive53.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAcer Aspire X3900  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer FIH57
Memory2.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100403
Uptime3.2 Days
Run DateFeb 16 '20 at 13:21
Run Duration183 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 650-$70
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
52.9% Above average
Memory 71.7
1-Core 80.5
2-Core 136
58% 96 Pts
4-Core 200
8-Core 201
27% 200 Pts
64-Core 204
13% 204 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 52.9%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 5570
Sapphire(174B E142) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1055.0
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
4.81% Terrible
Lighting 6.2
Reflection 6.81
Parallax 5.09
5% 6.03 fps
MRender 5.76
Gravity 4.33
Splatting 5.65
4% 5.25 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.81%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk X300s Non-Secure 256GB
186GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X2150000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 211 201 227 227 229 227 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
53.6% Above average
Read 236
Write 142
Mixed 163
SusWrite 220
43% 190 MB/s
4K Read 18.1
4K Write 36.9
4K Mixed 19.7
72% 24.9 MB/s
DQ Read 196
DQ Write 185
DQ Mixed 115
107% 165 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 53.6%
Great: 98%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$72
678GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 0.5
0% 0.5 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Mixed 0
0% 0 MB/s
Poor: 23% Great: 57%
Toshiba 2.5"External Har 500GB
191GB free, PID 0b1f
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 24 26 25 25 25 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
10.7% Very poor
Read 26.7
Write 18.4
Mixed 14.9
SusWrite 25.1
28% 21.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.2
22% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 10.7%
Great: 37%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hitachi GU512303EP0202 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
32.7% Below average
MC Read 10.7
MC Write 9.4
MC Mixed 14.2
33% 11.4 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 7.5
SC Mixed 8
23% 8.1 GB/s
Latency 97.5
41% 97.5 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 32.7%
Great: 39%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire X3900 Builds (Compare 69 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire X3900

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $83
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback