HLBS CMW1000T

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 100%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics38.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive82.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHLBS CMW1000T  (all builds)
MotherboardHLBS W480/SYS
Memory119.6 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211006
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 05 '23 at 11:06
Run Duration247 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-10900K-$415
LGA1200, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.85 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
95.5% Outstanding
Memory 81.4
1-Core 153
2-Core 306
96% 180 Pts
4-Core 586
8-Core 1,111
101% 848 Pts
64-Core 1,885
117% 1,885 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 95.5%
Great: 106%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia T1000
Nvidia(10DE 12DB) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2500 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 528.89
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
38.6% Below average
Lighting 47.6
Reflection 53.8
Parallax 45.1
39% 48.8 fps
MRender 49.5
Gravity 42.7
Splatting 47.8
38% 46.7 fps
Poor: 36%
This bench: 38.6%
Great: 39%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT1000BX500SSD1 1TB
714GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR054
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 245 400 403 405 405 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
82.8% Excellent
Read 506
Write 451
Mixed 414
SusWrite 316
95% 422 MB/s
4K Read 32.6
4K Write 89.2
4K Mixed 25.7
130% 49.2 MB/s
DQ Read 152
DQ Write 65.4
DQ Mixed 1
29% 72.7 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 82.8%
Great: 100%
Crucial P2 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$99
931GB free
Firmware: P2CR033 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1736 1698 1712 1724 1728 1725 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
264% Outstanding
Read 1,041
Write 1660
Mixed 1,250
SusWrite 1,720
322% 1,418 MB/s
4K Read 48.8
4K Write 167
4K Mixed 70.7
253% 95.4 MB/s
DQ Read 708
DQ Write 1,051
DQ Mixed 881
666% 880 MB/s
Poor: 84%
This bench: 264%
Great: 299%
Crucial P2 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$99
838GB free
Firmware: P2CR033 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1739 1743 1748 1743 1752 1751 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
260% Outstanding
Read 1,074
Write 1736
Mixed 1,273
SusWrite 1,746
331% 1,457 MB/s
4K Read 48.2
4K Write 148
4K Mixed 68.8
240% 88.3 MB/s
DQ Read 720
DQ Write 920
DQ Mixed 887
651% 842 MB/s
Poor: 84%
This bench: 260%
Great: 299%
Toshiba MG08ADA400E 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 0101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 241 241 236 242 243 240 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
140% Outstanding
Read 247
Write 238
Mixed 81.8
SusWrite 240
147% 202 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 7.4
4K Mixed 0.8
280% 3.17 MB/s
Poor: 102%
This bench: 140%
Great: 140%
Toshiba MG08ADA400E 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 0101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 246 247 247 245 248 247 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
136% Outstanding
Read 226
Write 203
Mixed 85
SusWrite 247
138% 190 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 0.9
217% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 102%
This bench: 136%
Great: 140%
Toshiba MG08ADA400E 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 0101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 234 242 241 241 242 236 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
140% Outstanding
Read 248
Write 220
Mixed 82.8
SusWrite 239
143% 197 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 5.1
4K Mixed 0.9
236% 2.33 MB/s
Poor: 102%
This bench: 140%
Great: 140%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata 4x31.8GB
4 of 4 slots used
127GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
88.4% Excellent
MC Read 31.5
MC Write 35
MC Mixed 27.7
90% 31.4 GB/s
SC Read 18
SC Write 41.8
SC Mixed 26.8
82% 28.9 GB/s
Latency 77.9
51% 77.9 ns
Poor: 77%
This bench: 88.4%
Great: 151%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CMW1000T Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht

System: HLBS CMW1000T

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $514
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback