HP EliteDesk 800 G3 TWR

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 56%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics71.8% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (61%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP EliteDesk 800 G3 TWR  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8298
Memory26.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170609
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 05 '23 at 07:19
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 61%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7500-$88
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
76.7% Very good
Memory 94.3
1-Core 109
2-Core 218
81% 141 Pts
4-Core 342
8-Core 355
46% 348 Pts
64-Core 358
22% 358 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 76.7%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$195
MSI(1462 3797) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 512.15
Performing below potential (67th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
71.8% Very good
Lighting 89.5
Reflection 88.7
Parallax 82.7
73% 87 fps
MRender 111
Gravity 79.8
Splatting 71.4
70% 87.4 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 71.8%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
KingFast 128GB
67GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V0718B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 259 379 169 132 133 100 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 42% Great: 85%
Hitachi HUA723030ALA641 3TB
3TB free
Firmware: MKAOA840
SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 143 142 142 144 141 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
77.8% Very good
Read 129
Write 137
Mixed 58.6
SusWrite 142
85% 117 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
182% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 77.8%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GU6JJR8N-VK HMA81GU6JJR8N-VK HMA81GU6CJR8N-VK HMA81GU6JJR8N-VK 32GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
77.2% Very good
MC Read 24.5
MC Write 30.8
MC Mixed 26.3
78% 27.2 GB/s
SC Read 15.3
SC Write 29.4
SC Mixed 23.6
65% 22.8 GB/s
Latency 59.1
68% 59.1 ns
Poor: 77%
This bench: 77.2%
Great: 122%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteDesk 800 G3 TWR Builds (Compare 975 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteDesk 800 G3 TWR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $167
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback