Gigabyte GA-Z97X-UD3H-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 94%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 77%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics112% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive55.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGigabyte Z97X-UD3H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z97X-UD3H-CF  (all builds)
Memory13.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140617
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 30 '17 at 09:55
Run Duration376 Seconds
Run User ISR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790-$135
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
84.8% Excellent
Memory 90.4
1-Core 112
2-Core 219
80% 141 Pts
4-Core 430
8-Core 602
65% 516 Pts
64-Core 603
37% 603 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 84.8%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$499
Gigabyte(1458 374C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
112% Outstanding
Lighting 145
Reflection 169
Parallax 140
118% 152 fps
MRender 128
Gravity 152
Splatting 122
109% 134 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 112%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSDSA2M080G2GC 1TB
185GB free
Firmware: 1AA01113 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
11% Very poor
Read 84.1
Write 113
Mixed 85.8
21% 94.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.74
4K Mixed 0.35
2% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 11%
Great: 11%
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$34
162GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z33130RL Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
55.2% Above average
Read 498
Write 252
Mixed 297
77% 349 MB/s
4K Read 17.1
4K Write 29.1
4K Mixed 6.01
49% 17.4 MB/s
DQ Read 13.9
DQ Write 258
DQ Mixed 5.54
43% 92.3 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 55.2%
Great: 86%
Corsair Force LS 240GB-$110
127GB free
Firmware: SAFC01.5 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
84.7% Excellent
Read 513
Write 311
Mixed 395
90% 407 MB/s
4K Read 26.1
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 12
112% 48.8 MB/s
DQ Read 303
DQ Write 303
DQ Mixed 12
89% 206 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 84.7%
Great: 91%
Seagate ST1000DX001-1CM162 2TB
511GB free
Firmware: CC4C Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 53% Great: 107%
Seagate ST2000DM001-1ER164 1TB
19GB free
Firmware: CC43 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
89.1% Excellent
Read 157
Write 152
Mixed 118
106% 142 MB/s
4K Read 0.78
4K Write 5.4
4K Mixed 0.69
208% 2.29 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 89.1%
Great: 109%
WD WD3200YS-01PGB0 320GB
12GB free
Firmware: 21.00M21 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 17% Great: 36%
WD Elements 25A2 2TB
925GB free, PID 25a2
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
44% Average
Read 103
Write 105
Mixed 78.4
121% 95.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.55
4K Write 1.94
4K Mixed 0.25
77% 0.91 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 44%
Great: 61%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 129GB
65GB free, PID 0748
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
30.3% Below average
Read 90.3
Write 59.7
Mixed 68.9
89% 72.9 MB/s
4K Read 5.3
4K Write 0.96
4K Mixed 0.72
77% 2.33 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 30.3%
Great: 30%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 32GB
22GB free, PID 0748
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
25.5% Poor
Read 91.3
Write 19.8
Mixed 31.4
48% 47.5 MB/s
4K Read 6.38
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.92
126% 3.13 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 25.5%
Great: 38%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ares DDR3 1333 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
51.6% Above average
MC Read 18
MC Write 18.5
MC Mixed 15.5
50% 17.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.1
SC Write 19.2
SC Mixed 17.2
48% 16.8 GB/s
Latency 66.7
60% 66.7 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 51.6%
Great: 71%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z97X-UD3H-CF Builds (Compare 1,122 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z97X-UD3H-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $648
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback