Supermicro SYS-1028R-WC1R

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Memory256GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 256GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemSupermicro SYS-1028R-WC1R  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro X10DRW-i
Memory76 GB free of 256 GB @ 2.7 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191122
Uptime87.5 Days
Run DateApr 05 '23 at 00:07
Run Duration253 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 33%

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2667 v4
CPU1, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
74.7% Very good
Memory 72.1
1-Core 103
2-Core 212
72% 129 Pts
4-Core 414
8-Core 759
70% 586 Pts
64-Core 1,621
100% 1,621 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 74.7%
Great: 87%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Avago SMC3108 480GB
51GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4.68
SusWrite @10s intervals: 320 329 316 299 299 287 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Samsung MZ7KH960HAJR-00005 960GB
138GB free
Firmware: 404Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 319 334 332 313 315 293 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
78% Very good
Read 422
Write 403
Mixed 362
SusWrite 318
85% 376 MB/s
4K Read 25
4K Write 61.4
4K Mixed 36.2
117% 40.9 MB/s
DQ Read 50.8
DQ Write 178
DQ Mixed 74.2
68% 101 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 78%
Great: 131%
Samsung MZ7KH960HAJR-00005 960GB
371GB free
Firmware: 404Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 318 334 332 313 314 293 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
80.1% Excellent
Read 414
Write 393
Mixed 370
SusWrite 317
84% 373 MB/s
4K Read 28.1
4K Write 63.6
4K Mixed 38
125% 43.2 MB/s
DQ Read 50.8
DQ Write 177
DQ Mixed 73.7
68% 100 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 80.1%
Great: 131%
Avago SMC3108 2TB
41GB free
Firmware: 4.68
SusWrite @10s intervals: 577 615 412 292 512 520 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Avago SMC3108 4TB
2TB free
Firmware: 4.68
SusWrite @10s intervals: 284 204 209 211 210 208 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A2K43CB2-CTD 16x16GB
16 of 16 slots used
256GB DIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (40th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
84.5% Excellent
MC Read 40.4
MC Write 29.7
MC Mixed 30.2
96% 33.4 GB/s
SC Read 7.8
SC Write 16.7
SC Mixed 14.2
37% 12.9 GB/s
Latency 96.6
41% 96.6 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 84.5%
Great: 150%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback