HP ProDesk 600 G1 SFF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics2.98% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive74.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP ProDesk 600 G1 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 18E7
Memory11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141211
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 04 '23 at 19:13
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4590-$188
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
64.9% Good
Memory 70.6
1-Core 99.5
2-Core 138
62% 103 Pts
4-Core 340
8-Core 351
46% 345 Pts
64-Core 353
22% 353 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 64.9%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15
HP(103C 18E7) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5126
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
2.98% Terrible
Lighting 3.4
Reflection 2.4
Parallax 6
3% 3.93 fps
MRender 5.5
Gravity 2.2
Splatting 4.6
3% 4.1 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.98%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Emtec X150 240GB
175GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN10936
SusWrite @10s intervals: 391 378 402 349 349 350 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
74.6% Very good
Read 424
Write 362
Mixed 335
SusWrite 370
84% 373 MB/s
4K Read 27.5
4K Write 56.9
4K Mixed 15
91% 33.1 MB/s
DQ Read 169
DQ Write 216
DQ Mixed 24.7
65% 137 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 74.6%
Great: 88%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$20
464GB free
Firmware: HPH4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 204 203 205 206 206 209 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
117% Outstanding
Read 203
Write 158
Mixed 73.9
SusWrite 206
117% 160 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
127% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 117%
Great: 88%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 240GB
61GB free, PID a207
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 38 38 37 37 37 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
38.8% Below average
Read 36.5
Write 36.6
Mixed 31.2
SusWrite 37.4
48% 35.4 MB/s
4K Read 9.6
4K Write 7.5
4K Mixed 8
563% 8.37 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 Samsung M378B5173QH0-CK0 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
25.2% Poor
MC Read 8.5
MC Write 8.7
MC Mixed 7.4
23% 8.2 GB/s
SC Read 7.5
SC Write 7.7
SC Mixed 8
22% 7.73 GB/s
Latency 99.9
40% 99.9 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 25.2%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProDesk 600 G1 SFF Builds (Compare 4,362 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProDesk 600 G1 SFF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $142
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback