Asus SABERTOOTH X99

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 200%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 178%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics259% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
14 months ago, 14 months ago.
MotherboardAsus SABERTOOTH X99  (all builds)
Memory39.6 GB free of 48 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190710
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 04 '23 at 12:18
Run Duration188 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6850K-$115
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
79.4% Very good
Memory 81.5
1-Core 114
2-Core 230
79% 142 Pts
4-Core 416
8-Core 668
66% 542 Pts
64-Core 798
49% 798 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 79.4%
Great: 93%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4090-$1,760
Asus(1043 889B) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3120 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 531.41
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
259% Outstanding
Lighting 369
Reflection 395
Parallax 740
301% 501 fps
MRender 395
Gravity 414
Splatting 290
293% 367 fps
Poor: 303%
This bench: 259%
Great: 407%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
7GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 434
Write 421
Mixed 374
91% 409 MB/s
4K Read 32.8
4K Write 61.9
4K Mixed 40.9
135% 45.2 MB/s
DQ Read 361
DQ Write 333
DQ Mixed 347
260% 347 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
Kingston HyperX 3K 240GB-$70
57GB free
Firmware: 60AABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 201 180 189 167 201 188 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
75.4% Very good
Read 372
Write 273
Mixed 290
SusWrite 188
63% 281 MB/s
4K Read 27.7
4K Write 60
4K Mixed 35.4
119% 41 MB/s
DQ Read 271
DQ Write 268
DQ Mixed 289
212% 276 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 75.4%
Great: 94%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$46
72GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,895
Write 1,659
Mixed 1,315
361% 1,623 MB/s
4K Read 40.7
4K Write 72.6
4K Mixed 51.4
166% 54.9 MB/s
DQ Read 507
DQ Write 337
DQ Mixed 468
337% 437 MB/s
Poor: 152% Great: 302%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2016)-$114
950GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 150 148 127 148 155 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
71.6% Very good
Read 107
Write 87.5
Mixed 50.8
SusWrite 143
71% 97 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
129% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 71.6%
Great: 105%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79
2TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 144 145 156 151 153 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
68.7% Good
Read 91
Write 128
Mixed 73
SusWrite 148
81% 110 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
88% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 68.7%
Great: 90%
WD Green 2TB (2010)-$100
168GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 80 80 89 89 81 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
41.6% Average
Read 61.7
Write 68.5
Mixed 40.7
SusWrite 82.9
46% 63.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
122% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 41.6%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 6x8GB
6 of 8 slots used
48GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
91.5% Outstanding
MC Read 35.9
MC Write 37.8
MC Mixed 32.3
101% 35.3 GB/s
SC Read 12.8
SC Write 19.2
SC Mixed 18.8
48% 16.9 GB/s
Latency 77.9
51% 77.9 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 91.5%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SABERTOOTH X99 Builds (Compare 962 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus SABERTOOTH X99

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 114% - Outstanding Total price: $418
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback