bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory13.1GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 13.1GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced. Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemVMware, VMware20,1
MotherboardIntel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory9.9 GB free of 13.0977 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221205
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 04 '23 at 10:31
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 38%

 PC Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: AMD Ryzen 7 5700U Graphics
CPU 0, 2 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
47.9% Average
Memory 44.5
1-Core 103
2-Core 191
60% 113 Pts
4-Core 308
8-Core 232
38% 270 Pts
64-Core 16.8
1% 16.8 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 47.9%
Great: 79%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vmware Virtual NVMe Disk 69GB
35GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 34 41 32 38 42 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
32.2% Below average
Read 74.7
Write 68.9
Mixed 38.7
SusWrite 35.8
40% 54.5 MB/s
4K Read 3.6
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1.4
346% 2.4 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 32.2%
Great: 96%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
VMware Virtual RAM VMW-8192MB Virtual RAM VMW-4096MB Virtual RAM VMW-1024MB Virtual RAM VMW-64MB Virtual RAM VMW-32MB Virtual RAM VMW-4MB 13GB
0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 MHz
8192, 4096, 1024, 64, 32, 4 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
14.4% Very poor
MC Read 4.8
MC Write 6.5
MC Mixed 5.1
16% 5.47 GB/s
SC Read 1.4
SC Write 0.9
SC Mixed 0.5
3% 0.93 GB/s
Latency 182
22% 182 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14.4%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,440 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback