Acer Veriton M200-A55

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics4.29% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (53%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAcer Veriton M200-A55  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Veriton Series
Memory8.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150309
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 04 '23 at 08:21
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 53%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-6500 APU
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
42.9% Average
Memory 61
1-Core 56.3
2-Core 82
42% 66.4 Pts
4-Core 141
8-Core 163
20% 152 Pts
64-Core 155
10% 155 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 42.9%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8570D
Device(1B0A 01A4) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.1901.0
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
4.29% Terrible
Lighting 4.9
Reflection 6
Parallax 4.9
4% 5.27 fps
MRender 5.3
Gravity 4.2
Splatting 7.6
5% 5.7 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.29%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba DT01ABA100V 1TB
518GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU2OA720
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 67 87 99 99 99 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
50.3% Above average
Read 88.7
Write 95.4
Mixed 33.8
SusWrite 86.6
55% 76.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.4
85% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 50.3%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown EWB4GB681PAE-16IC 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
29.2% Poor
MC Read 14.5
MC Write 6
MC Mixed 10.3
29% 10.3 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 6.6
SC Mixed 8.8
22% 7.7 GB/s
Latency 125
32% 125 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 29.2%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Veriton M200-A55 Builds (Compare 25 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Veriton M200-A55

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $135
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback