Gigabyte GA-X299X DESIGNARE 10G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 113%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 153%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics152% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory96GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 96GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X299X DESIGNARE 10G  (all builds)
Memory89.3 GB free of 96 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210427
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateApr 03 '23 at 20:49
Run Duration253 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-10980XE-$1,100
CPU0, 1 CPU, 18 cores, 36 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
76% Very good
Memory 62.1
1-Core 128
2-Core 227
76% 139 Pts
4-Core 480
8-Core 959
85% 720 Pts
64-Core 2,718
168% 2,718 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 76%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$500
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 526.86
Performing below potential (77th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
152% Outstanding
Lighting 226
Reflection 205
Parallax 194
184% 208 fps
MRender 196
Gravity 155
Splatting 136
130% 162 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 152%
Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDS500G1X0E-00AFY0 500GB
82GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 611100WD
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,489
Write 2,088
Mixed 2,020
490% 2,199 MB/s
4K Read 75.9
4K Write 199
4K Mixed 93.7
341% 123 MB/s
DQ Read 1,153
DQ Write 897
DQ Mixed 1,015
762% 1,022 MB/s
Poor: 234% Great: 494%
WDC WD40EFAX-68JH4N1 4TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 83.00A83
SusWrite @10s intervals: 182 182 182 180 179 182 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
35.3% Below average
Read 181
Write 177
Mixed 84.9
SusWrite 181
35% 156 MB/s
4K Read 36.1
4K Write 12.6
4K Mixed 1.1
63% 16.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1.2
DQ Write 9.7
DQ Mixed 0.8
2% 3.9 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 35.3%
Great: 38%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$76
338GB free
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 435 436 436 437 439 438 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
125% Outstanding
Read 474
Write 463
Mixed 372
SusWrite 437
98% 436 MB/s
4K Read 46.7
4K Write 113
4K Mixed 59.5
207% 73 MB/s
DQ Read 374
DQ Write 331
DQ Mixed 354
265% 353 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 125%
Great: 134%
WDC WD40EFAX-68JH4N1 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 83.00A83
SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 171 172 172 168 171 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
36% Below average
Read 175
Write 163
Mixed 89.3
SusWrite 171
34% 150 MB/s
4K Read 40.1
4K Write 12.4
4K Mixed 1.1
69% 17.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1.4
DQ Write 10.5
DQ Mixed 0.8
2% 4.23 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 36%
Great: 38%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
197GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 179 180 183 183 184 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
95.9% Outstanding
Read 153
Write 82
Mixed 80.7
SusWrite 181
91% 124 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
126% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 95.9%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3x31.7GB
3 of 8 slots used
95GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
49.5% Average
MC Read 15.8
MC Write 23
MC Mixed 15.9
52% 18.2 GB/s
SC Read 7.9
SC Write 21.1
SC Mixed 8.8
36% 12.6 GB/s
Latency 122
33% 122 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 49.5%
Great: 95%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X299X DESIGNARE 10G Builds (Compare 143 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 176%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 222%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X299X DESIGNARE 10G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $2,402
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback