Asus PRIME Z370-A

Performance Results


Gaming 83% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 68% Battle cruiser


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	112% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	38.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

14 months ago, 14 months ago.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME Z370-A (all builds)
Memory	9.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit, Цвета: 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180702
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 03 '23 at 08:47
Run Duration	139 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel CC150 5 User benchmarks, average bench 59% CPU 0, 1 CPU, 7 cores, 7 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	70.7% Very good	Memory 78.6 1-Core 99.6 2-Core 195 71% 124 Pts	4-Core 342 8-Core 472 51% 407 Pts	64-Core 490 30% 490 Pts
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 70.7% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Tesla T10 18 User benchmarks, average bench 103% Nvidia(10DE 1370) ≥ 4GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.2727 Performing below potential (61^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	112% Outstanding	Lighting 144 Reflection 131 Parallax 156 118% 144 fps	MRender 134 Gravity 152 Splatting 126 111% 137 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 112% Great: 117%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Red Hat VirtIO 64GB 86 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 15GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 110 110 110 117 122 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	38.2% Below average	Read 443 Write 160 Mixed 230 SusWrite 112 52% 236 MB/s	4K Read 11.4 4K Write 8.9 4K Mixed 9.1 34% 9.8 MB/s	DQ Read 90.3 DQ Write 62.4 DQ Mixed 67.4 53% 73.4 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 38.2% Great: 58%
Red Hat VirtIO 31TB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 1.5TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 113 108 111 116 117 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	30.7% Below average	Read 394 Write 162 Mixed 240 SusWrite 112 50% 227 MB/s	4K Read 8.7 4K Write 7 4K Mixed 7.3 26% 7.67 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 30.7% Great: 58%
Red Hat VirtIO 1TB 14 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 69GB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 109 102 106 110 116 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	34% Below average	Read 443 Write 184 Mixed 259 SusWrite 108 55% 248 MB/s	4K Read 9.9 4K Write 7.8 4K Mixed 9.3 31% 9 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 34% Great: 50%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
QEMU 1x12GB 4,175 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 1 of 1 slots used 12GB DIMM RAM Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	86.8% Excellent	MC Read 31 MC Write 34.9 MC Mixed 29.5 91% 31.8 GB/s	SC Read 16.7 SC Write 33.8 SC Mixed 22.5 70% 24.3 GB/s	Latency 83.2 48% 83.2 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 86.8% Great: 119%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME Z370-A Builds (Compare 11,310 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 110%

UFO

Desktop 91%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 100%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus PRIME Z370-A - $132

CPU
Core i7-8700KIntel $191Bench 88%, 746,287 samples	6,033x
Core i5-8600KIntel $125Bench 91%, 264,837 samples	2,137x
Core i7-8700Intel $186Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	948x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	1,118x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	1,079x
GTX 1070Nvidia $278Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	749x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	544x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $84Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	498x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	412x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	849x
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	319x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 4x8GBCorsairBench 87%, 76,101 samples	306x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 71% - Very good

Total price: $930

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16