Gigabyte GA-MZA2-CE0-00

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (6th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 94 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive81.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory256GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 256GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGIGABYTE R162-ZA0-00
MotherboardGigabyte GA-MZA2-CE0-00  (all builds)
Memory249.5 GB free of 256 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20221025
Uptime1.5 Days
Run DateApr 03 '23 at 04:01
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 37%

 PC Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD EPYC 7551 32-Core
P0, 1 CPU, 32 cores, 64 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 1.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
45.5% Average
Memory 61.3
1-Core 33.6
2-Core 72.2
36% 55.7 Pts
4-Core 162
8-Core 270
26% 216 Pts
64-Core 2,434
151% 2,434 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 45.5%
Great: 66%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron_5400_MTFDDAK960TGA 960GB
844GB free (System drive)
Firmware: D4MU002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 370 369 366 355 363 361 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
81.8% Excellent
Read 379
Write 404
Mixed 306
SusWrite 364
82% 363 MB/s
4K Read 23.6
4K Write 54.8
4K Mixed 31
104% 36.5 MB/s
DQ Read 292
DQ Write 243
DQ Mixed 279
206% 271 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 81.8%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A4K40DB3-CWE M393A4K40DB3-CWE M393A4K40CB2-CVF M393A4K40CB2-CVF M393A4K40CB2-CVF M393A4K40CB2-CVF M393A4K40CB2-CVF M393A4K40CB2-CVF 255GB
3200, 3200, 2933, 2933, 2933, 2933, 2933, 2933 MHz
32767, 32767, 32767, 32767, 32767, 32767, 32767, 32767 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
79.2% Very good
MC Read 30.5
MC Write 31
MC Mixed 29.4
87% 30.3 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 18.9
SC Mixed 19.1
51% 17.8 GB/s
Latency 124
32% 124 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback