Gigabyte GA-H370M D3H GSM-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics24.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive91.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemGigabyte H370M D3H GSM
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H370M D3H GSM-CF  (all builds)
Memory13 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200916
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 03 '23 at 02:29
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400-$160
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
85.1% Excellent
Memory 90.5
1-Core 117
2-Core 242
84% 150 Pts
4-Core 446
8-Core 534
64% 490 Pts
64-Core 562
35% 562 Pts
Poor: 78%
This bench: 85.1%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 270-$140
CLim: 975 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
24.8% Poor
Lighting 31.9
Reflection 34.5
Parallax 41.1
26% 35.8 fps
MRender 29.5
Gravity 30.5
Splatting 23.9
22% 28 fps
Poor: 22%
This bench: 24.8%
Great: 26%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Spcc Solid State Disk 1TB
886GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 030fAA20
SusWrite @10s intervals: 452 410 408 412 433 430 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
91.6% Outstanding
Read 434
Write 466
Mixed 395
SusWrite 424
97% 430 MB/s
4K Read 27.4
4K Write 77.7
4K Mixed 34.4
127% 46.5 MB/s
DQ Read 142
DQ Write 280
DQ Mixed 148
130% 190 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 91.6%
Great: 101%
Samsung Spinpoint F4 2TB-$119
2TB free
Firmware: 1AQ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 134 132 138 135 136 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
72.4% Very good
Read 117
Write 65.5
Mixed 65.7
SusWrite 135
70% 95.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.9
177% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 72.4%
Great: 72%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT4G4DFS824A.C8FBR2 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
80.3% Excellent
MC Read 28.8
MC Write 31.1
MC Mixed 25.3
81% 28.4 GB/s
SC Read 16.5
SC Write 33.5
SC Mixed 24
70% 24.7 GB/s
Latency 66.5
60% 66.5 ns
Poor: 75%
This bench: 80.3%
Great: 100%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H370M D3H GSM-CF Builds (Compare 174 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 56%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 51%
Yacht

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H370M D3H GSM-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $378
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback