HP ProDesk 600 G1 SFF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.88% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (74%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP ProDesk 600 G1 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 18E7
Memory9.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200220
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 02 '23 at 15:18
Run Duration176 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 74%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4590-$188
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
55.6% Above average
Memory 74
1-Core 90.3
2-Core 182
66% 115 Pts
4-Core 214
8-Core 235
30% 224 Pts
64-Core 235
14% 235 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 55.6%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15
HP(103C 18E7) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5171
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
2.88% Terrible
Lighting 3.4
Reflection 2.2
Parallax 5.7
3% 3.77 fps
MRender 4.2
Gravity 2.1
Splatting 4.7
3% 3.67 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.88%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
249GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 387 293 407 397 216 284 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 74% Great: 129%
LSI Logical Volume 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 3000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 113 140 140 176 187 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Asmt106x_ V0Fast 8TB
5TB free
Firmware: 200604
SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 171 206 189 171 183 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
119% Outstanding
Read 234
Write 249
Mixed 134
SusWrite 180
146% 199 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 5.3
4K Mixed 1
276% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 119%
Great: 119%
LSI Logical Volume 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 3000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 169 204 189 172 183 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Hitachi HUS724040ALE641 4TB
5TB free
Firmware: MJAOA5F0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 245 262 280 263 257 275 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 54% Great: 92%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5173QH0-CK0 M378B5173EB0-YK0 M378B5173QH0-CK0 M378B5173EB0-YK0 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
41.4% Average
MC Read 14.7
MC Write 14.8
MC Mixed 13.2
41% 14.2 GB/s
SC Read 10.4
SC Write 13.6
SC Mixed 14.1
36% 12.7 GB/s
Latency 92.5
43% 92.5 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 41.4%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProDesk 600 G1 SFF Builds (Compare 4,360 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProDesk 600 G1 SFF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $142
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback