Shuttle SZ270R9

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics53.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive344% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemShuttle SZ270R9  (all builds)
MotherboardShuttle FZ270
Memory27.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200417
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 02 '23 at 14:32
Run Duration308 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$247
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
80.1% Excellent
Memory 88
1-Core 112
2-Core 219
80% 140 Pts
4-Core 394
8-Core 537
59% 465 Pts
64-Core 564
35% 564 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 80.1%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Asus(1043 8641) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 528.02
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
53.7% Above average
Lighting 65.6
Reflection 96.2
Parallax 57.7
54% 73.2 fps
MRender 66.4
Gravity 68.3
Splatting 64.5
54% 66.4 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 53.7%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 PRO with Heatsink 1TB
682GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1429 1870 1916 1968 1978 1981 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
344% Outstanding
Read 2,470
Write 2,306
Mixed 2,248
SusWrite 1,857
500% 2,220 MB/s
4K Read 70.4
4K Write 133
4K Mixed 91.1
294% 98.2 MB/s
DQ Read 990
DQ Write 808
DQ Mixed 913
680% 904 MB/s
Poor: 254%
This bench: 344%
Great: 469%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
549GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 480 487 487 487 488 487 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
125% Outstanding
Read 509
Write 486
Mixed 461
SusWrite 486
110% 486 MB/s
4K Read 41.7
4K Write 100
4K Mixed 57
189% 66.3 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 338
DQ Mixed 354
267% 359 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 125%
Great: 133%
Samsung 840 Pro 512GB-$129
134GB free
Firmware: DXM06B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 479 486 486 486 486 486 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 505
Write 458
Mixed 367
SusWrite 485
102% 454 MB/s
4K Read 33.7
4K Write 90.5
4K Mixed 44.8
156% 56.3 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 336
DQ Mixed 195
191% 304 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 114%
Great: 118%
WD Green SN350 2TB
973GB free
Firmware: 33006000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2204 2206 2200 2211 2215 2210 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
328% Outstanding
Read 1,863
Write 2,146
Mixed 1,954
SusWrite 2,208
462% 2,043 MB/s
4K Read 53.6
4K Write 139
4K Mixed 74.2
250% 88.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,067
DQ Write 781
DQ Mixed 913
686% 921 MB/s
Poor: 167%
This bench: 328%
Great: 390%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
205GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 480 487 487 487 415 282 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
121% Outstanding
Read 510
Write 482
Mixed 460
SusWrite 440
107% 473 MB/s
4K Read 41.1
4K Write 99.3
4K Mixed 55
185% 65.1 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 338
DQ Mixed 354
267% 358 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 121%
Great: 129%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX2133C14/8G KHX2133C14/8G KHX2133C14D4/8G KHX2133C14/8G 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
74.2% Very good
MC Read 25.6
MC Write 28.7
MC Mixed 24.1
75% 26.1 GB/s
SC Read 15.7
SC Write 30.7
SC Mixed 23.1
66% 23.2 GB/s
Latency 69.5
58% 69.5 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 74.2%
Great: 100%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SZ270R9 Builds (Compare 29 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat

System: Shuttle SZ270R9

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $363
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback