Asus TUF Gaming FX505GT_FX95GT

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics43.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive133% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
14 months ago, 13 months ago.
SystemAsus TUF Gaming FX505GT_FX95GT  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX505GT
Memory6.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210208
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 02 '23 at 08:56
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
85.1% Excellent
Memory 93.8
1-Core 115
2-Core 214
82% 141 Pts
4-Core 418
8-Core 565
62% 491 Pts
64-Core 568
35% 568 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 85.1%
Great: 87%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Asus(1043 1AB1) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9168
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
4.67% Terrible
Lighting 6
Reflection 9.1
Parallax 8.2
5% 7.77 fps
MRender 10.6
Gravity 7.1
Splatting 0.2
4% 5.97 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.67%
Great: 6%
Nvidia GTX 1650 (Mobile)
Asus(1043 1AB1) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 531.41
Performing below potential (67th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
43.2% Average
Lighting 56.1
Reflection 62
Parallax 50.7
46% 56.3 fps
MRender 41.4
Gravity 49.8
Splatting 48.3
38% 46.5 fps
Poor: 28%
This bench: 43.2%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$60
233GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 316 12 16 163 58 55 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
133% Outstanding
Read 1251
Write 872
Mixed 856
SusWrite 103
171% 771 MB/s
4K Read 44.9
4K Write 83.6
4K Mixed 55.2
183% 61.2 MB/s
DQ Read 332
DQ Write 534
DQ Mixed 222
228% 363 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 133%
Great: 209%
Kingston SA400S37960G 960GB
165GB free
Firmware: S3401103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 33 321 392 352 32 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
57.7% Above average
Read 473
Write 399
Mixed 380
SusWrite 194
81% 361 MB/s
4K Read 22.5
4K Write 55.1
4K Mixed 11.6
78% 29.7 MB/s
DQ Read 164
DQ Write 31.4
DQ Mixed 39.7
44% 78.5 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 57.7%
Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2666 C15 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
80.3% Excellent
MC Read 29.2
MC Write 30.8
MC Mixed 24.6
81% 28.2 GB/s
SC Read 16.7
SC Write 33.4
SC Mixed 23.8
70% 24.6 GB/s
Latency 60.2
66% 60.2 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 80.3%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Gaming FX505GT_FX95GT Builds (Compare 78 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Asus TUF Gaming FX505GT_FX95GT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 51% - Above average Total price: $60
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback