Asus TUF Gaming FX505GT_FX95GT

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics44% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive138% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
13 months ago, 13 months ago.
SystemAsus TUF Gaming FX505GT_FX95GT  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX505GT
Memory7.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210208
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 23 '23 at 07:45
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
88.4% Excellent
Memory 95.4
1-Core 120
2-Core 232
85% 149 Pts
4-Core 439
8-Core 675
69% 557 Pts
64-Core 765
47% 765 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 88.4%
Great: 87%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Asus(1043 1AB1) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9168
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
5.91% Terrible
Lighting 6
Reflection 9.1
Parallax 8.1
5% 7.73 fps
MRender 10.8
Gravity 6.9
Splatting 10.8
8% 9.5 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.91%
Great: 6%
Nvidia GTX 1650 (Mobile)
Asus(1043 1AB1) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 531.29
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
44% Average
Lighting 57
Reflection 63
Parallax 51.6
46% 57.2 fps
MRender 42.1
Gravity 50.8
Splatting 49.4
39% 47.4 fps
Poor: 28%
This bench: 44%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$60
234GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 436 55 57 73 58 48 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
138% Outstanding
Read 1,341
Write 906
Mixed 847
SusWrite 121
178% 804 MB/s
4K Read 45.6
4K Write 79.3
4K Mixed 55.8
183% 60.2 MB/s
DQ Read 334
DQ Write 551
DQ Mixed 118
181% 334 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 138%
Great: 209%
Kingston SA400S37960G 960GB
108GB free
Firmware: S3401103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 15 13 12 68 418 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 41% Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2666 C15 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
82.3% Excellent
MC Read 31.8
MC Write 30.2
MC Mixed 24.9
83% 29 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 33.6
SC Mixed 25.4
70% 24.4 GB/s
Latency 56
72% 56 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 82.3%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Gaming FX505GT_FX95GT Builds (Compare 78 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Asus TUF Gaming FX505GT_FX95GT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 51% - Above average Total price: $60
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback